| 9 Feb 2023 |
Lily Foster | In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org I took a look, but couldn't figure out anything concrete in the logs. If you see it again, ping me with the PR number? We'll see if I can scrounge up any more details if it does happen again. Will do! I can give you the time and PR number for the one above if you need, but I haven't seen it happen again today so maybe it fixed itself | 15:45:25 |
cole-h | Yeah, usually a GC run will fix that, and GC runs happen automatically eventually~ | 15:46:06 |
| 13 Feb 2023 |
vcunat |
We might want to consider downgrading OfBorg and Hydra to Nix 2.11, or we're going to end up with a lot of packages that shouldn't ever have built, but did due to a Nix regression, and won't any more once https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/7813 is fixed.
https://matrix.to/#/!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org/$pu9FnI-W-44UpqBRmGVo05LzfH7vePBmL3-_3kJOqBY?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=nixos.dev
| 18:40:26 |
cole-h | Thanks, taking a look | 18:41:09 |
cole-h | OK, they should all be running 2.11 right now. | 19:11:47 |
Alyssa Ross | Great, thanks | 20:21:41 |
cole-h | Maybe unrelated, but ofborg is having a bit of an issue right now. All evaluators are unable to do their job. Investigating. | 20:59:25 |
cole-h | OK, they should be slowly coming back. Long story short: weirdness with the GitHub App RSA key (that allows ofborg to sign a JWT to do its thing) | 21:52:06 |
Winter (she/her) | Huh, did it expire? | 21:52:21 |
Winter (she/her) | Thank you nonetheless as always. | 21:52:28 |
cole-h | No, I screwed something up :) | 21:52:30 |
Winter (she/her) | * Huh, did it expire or something stupid? | 21:52:32 |
cole-h | Fix: https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/634
I'll be deploying this tomorrow. | 22:48:14 |
| 15 Feb 2023 |
Winter (she/her) | cole-h: Would you mind confirming that https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/216231 only had one build attempt per system?
I ask because the author is saying that they could have sworn it succeeded on OfBorg's x86_64-darwin when it timed out (plus, the current derivation fails on Darwin -- there's no chance it actually did succeed even if it didn't time out). Even though I don't think it's actually the case (as the logs site confirms), I just want to be 100% sure. Thank you! | 05:36:54 |
cole-h | In reply to @winterqt:nixos.dev
cole-h: Would you mind confirming that https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/216231 only had one build attempt per system?
I ask because the author is saying that they could have sworn it succeeded on OfBorg's x86_64-darwin when it timed out (plus, the current derivation fails on Darwin -- there's no chance it actually did succeed even if it didn't time out). Even though I don't think it's actually the case (as the logs site confirms), I just want to be 100% sure. Thank you! Whatever you see on logs.nix.ci is the truth of what happened :P So x86_64-darwin only ever timed out: https://logs.nix.ci/?attempt_id=7e2121db-9d89-4c2b-85a7-8c0dc23fcccd&key=nixos%2Fnixpkgs.216231 | 15:10:52 |