!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

174 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>61 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
9 Feb 2023
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
I took a look, but couldn't figure out anything concrete in the logs. If you see it again, ping me with the PR number? We'll see if I can scrounge up any more details if it does happen again.
Will do! I can give you the time and PR number for the one above if you need, but I haven't seen it happen again today so maybe it fixed itself
15:45:25
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hYeah, usually a GC run will fix that, and GC runs happen automatically eventually~15:46:06
13 Feb 2023
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat

We might want to consider downgrading OfBorg and Hydra to Nix 2.11, or we're going to end up with a lot of packages that shouldn't ever have built, but did due to a Nix regression, and won't any more once https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/7813 is fixed.

https://matrix.to/#/!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org/$pu9FnI-W-44UpqBRmGVo05LzfH7vePBmL3-_3kJOqBY?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=nixos.dev

18:40:26
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hThanks, taking a look18:41:09
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hOK, they should all be running 2.11 right now.19:11:47
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossGreat, thanks20:21:41
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hMaybe unrelated, but ofborg is having a bit of an issue right now. All evaluators are unable to do their job. Investigating.20:59:25
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hOK, they should be slowly coming back. Long story short: weirdness with the GitHub App RSA key (that allows ofborg to sign a JWT to do its thing)21:52:06
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)Huh, did it expire?21:52:21
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)Thank you nonetheless as always.21:52:28
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hNo, I screwed something up :)21:52:30
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)* Huh, did it expire or something stupid?21:52:32
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hFix: https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/634 I'll be deploying this tomorrow.22:48:14
15 Feb 2023
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)

cole-h: Would you mind confirming that https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/216231 only had one build attempt per system?

I ask because the author is saying that they could have sworn it succeeded on OfBorg's x86_64-darwin when it timed out (plus, the current derivation fails on Darwin -- there's no chance it actually did succeed even if it didn't time out). Even though I don't think it's actually the case (as the logs site confirms), I just want to be 100% sure. Thank you!

05:36:54
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h
In reply to @winterqt:nixos.dev

cole-h: Would you mind confirming that https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/216231 only had one build attempt per system?

I ask because the author is saying that they could have sworn it succeeded on OfBorg's x86_64-darwin when it timed out (plus, the current derivation fails on Darwin -- there's no chance it actually did succeed even if it didn't time out). Even though I don't think it's actually the case (as the logs site confirms), I just want to be 100% sure. Thank you!

Whatever you see on logs.nix.ci is the truth of what happened :P So x86_64-darwin only ever timed out: https://logs.nix.ci/?attempt_id=7e2121db-9d89-4c2b-85a7-8c0dc23fcccd&key=nixos%2Fnixpkgs.216231
15:10:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6