!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

182 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: https://ofborg.org/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=1&g0.stacked=0&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2h&g1.expr=ofborg_queue_builder_waiting%7Barch!~%22.*-lowprior%22%7D&g1.tab=1&g1.stacked=0&g1.show_exemplars=0&g1.range_input=2h63 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Oct 2022
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaprobably cached?14:38:52
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hYeah, that's what I'm thinking as well.14:39:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaideally cached should not 404 😛14:39:20
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hMore accurately, empty log should probably not 40414:39:39
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h
In reply to @ncfavier:matrix.org
is it actually supposed to be cleared when ofborg starts eval, or should the text say "finishes"?
Essentially, I don't care either way, but I don't know if there's a way (using the API) to get the action to be marked successful once ofborg's started working on it.
14:41:50
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hMaybe you could start with looking at the valid values for this and go from there: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/e32a01b9226da663106ceee40594443fef24dfda/.github/workflows/pending-clear.yml#L514:47:10
@ncfavier:matrix.orgncfavier yeah i glanced over the API docs already but there's only completed 15:03:04
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hIf there's no other easy way to look at when ofborg first pushes a status, then I think changing the wording would be fine :)15:13:47
12 Oct 2022
@k900:0upti.meK900Where do I poke ofborg to make it recalculate the labels?11:35:38
@k900:0upti.meK900It's not doing that on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/19135711:35:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaeval should to that imo11:42:56
@k900:0upti.meK900That's what I thought too 12:06:18
@k900:0upti.meK900 But it doesn't match my nixpkgs-review numbers 12:06:30
@k900:0upti.meK900Unless it's also counting broken packages? 12:06:39
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h You can see which packages it thinks has changed, and for which architecture, by clicking the "Details" link next to the ofborg-eval — ^.^! status. That'll tell you what ofborg thinks changed. 16:28:41
@k900:0upti.meK900Oh16:29:42
@k900:0upti.meK900It does count broken packages16:29:52
@k900:0upti.meK900Is that intentional?16:29:57
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hProbably16:30:21
@k900:0upti.meK900It just misfires hard on KDE stuff because we have three different attrsets for Qt 5.12, 5.14 and 5.1516:30:57
@k900:0upti.meK900And the KDE stuff is included in all three, but marked broken on <5.1516:31:09
@k900:0upti.meK900So ofborg counts 1.5k rebuilds when there's really about 50016:32:37
13 Oct 2022
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadisk full https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/19112318:25:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanvm, olde18:25:47
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * nvm, old18:25:47
14 Oct 2022
@ncfavier:matrix.orgncfavier
In reply to @ncfavier:matrix.org
can we talk about the "pending status [that] will be cleared when ofborg starts eval" that's only cleared when ofborg finishes eval?
proposed a fix https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/195984
14:10:40
15 Oct 2022
@tinybronca:sibnsk.netunderpantsgnome changed their display name from underpantsgnome to underpantsgnome!.00:30:21
17 Oct 2022
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinhttps://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/61818:03:20
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinci passed18:03:23
22 Oct 2022
@zseri:matrix.orgzserihuh, why does https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/190730/checks?check_run_id=9036063946 get marked as "neutral" instead of "failure/error" (one of the modified packages itself failed to compile)?11:47:03

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6