| 11 Oct 2022 |
hexa | probably cached? | 14:38:52 |
cole-h | Yeah, that's what I'm thinking as well. | 14:39:07 |
hexa | ideally cached should not 404 😛 | 14:39:20 |
cole-h | More accurately, empty log should probably not 404 | 14:39:39 |
cole-h | In reply to @ncfavier:matrix.org is it actually supposed to be cleared when ofborg starts eval, or should the text say "finishes"? Essentially, I don't care either way, but I don't know if there's a way (using the API) to get the action to be marked successful once ofborg's started working on it. | 14:41:50 |
cole-h | Maybe you could start with looking at the valid values for this and go from there: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/e32a01b9226da663106ceee40594443fef24dfda/.github/workflows/pending-clear.yml#L5 | 14:47:10 |
ncfavier | yeah i glanced over the API docs already but there's only completed | 15:03:04 |
cole-h | If there's no other easy way to look at when ofborg first pushes a status, then I think changing the wording would be fine :) | 15:13:47 |
| 12 Oct 2022 |
K900 | Where do I poke ofborg to make it recalculate the labels? | 11:35:38 |
K900 | It's not doing that on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/191357 | 11:35:43 |
hexa | eval should to that imo | 11:42:56 |
K900 | That's what I thought too | 12:06:18 |
K900 | But it doesn't match my nixpkgs-review numbers | 12:06:30 |
K900 | Unless it's also counting broken packages? | 12:06:39 |
cole-h | You can see which packages it thinks has changed, and for which architecture, by clicking the "Details" link next to the ofborg-eval — ^.^! status. That'll tell you what ofborg thinks changed. | 16:28:41 |
K900 | Oh | 16:29:42 |
K900 | It does count broken packages | 16:29:52 |
K900 | Is that intentional? | 16:29:57 |
cole-h | Probably | 16:30:21 |
K900 | It just misfires hard on KDE stuff because we have three different attrsets for Qt 5.12, 5.14 and 5.15 | 16:30:57 |
K900 | And the KDE stuff is included in all three, but marked broken on <5.15 | 16:31:09 |
K900 | So ofborg counts 1.5k rebuilds when there's really about 500 | 16:32:37 |
| 13 Oct 2022 |
hexa | disk full https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/191123 | 18:25:16 |
hexa | nvm, olde | 18:25:47 |
hexa | * nvm, old | 18:25:47 |
| 14 Oct 2022 |
ncfavier | In reply to @ncfavier:matrix.org can we talk about the "pending status [that] will be cleared when ofborg starts eval" that's only cleared when ofborg finishes eval? proposed a fix https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/195984 | 14:10:40 |
| 15 Oct 2022 |
| underpantsgnome changed their display name from underpantsgnome to underpantsgnome!. | 00:30:21 |
| 17 Oct 2022 |
Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/618 | 18:03:20 |
Artturin | ci passed | 18:03:23 |
| 22 Oct 2022 |
zseri | huh, why does https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/190730/checks?check_run_id=9036063946 get marked as "neutral" instead of "failure/error" (one of the modified packages itself failed to compile)? | 11:47:03 |