| 24 Mar 2022 |
cole-h | Going to be redeploying ofborg to pick up https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/588 and give that a shot. Cross your fingers. | 20:39:07 |
cole-h | As always, let me know if you see any weirdness :) | 20:39:33 |
| 26 Mar 2022 |
Sandro 🐧 | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network taken from https://github.blog/2022-03-23-an-update-on-recent-service-disruptions/ It seems to be that a lot of downtimes are due to their database | 09:23:44 |
| 27 Mar 2022 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org invited Artturin. | 23:19:12 |
| Artturin joined the room. | 23:19:17 |
Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/165994 | 23:21:25 |
Artturin | cole-h: | 23:21:32 |
cole-h | Does that affect pythonX.pkgs.pkgname? | 23:22:23 |
cole-h | e.g. will ofborg now skip python3.pkgs.asdf: 1.1.1 -> 1.2.1 | 23:22:52 |
cole-h | * e.g. will ofborg now skip `python3.pkgs.asdf: 1.1.1 -> 1.2.1`? | 23:22:56 |
Artturin | No | 23:24:15 |
cole-h | Then seems fine to me. | 23:24:28 |
Artturin | Should we merge and test? | 23:24:45 |
Artturin | Idk if there's a performance penalty | 23:25:03 |
Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/165994/checks?check_run_id=5711647587 | 23:25:36 |
Artturin | hexa: im testing if a performance penalty can be avoided with dontRecurseIntoAttrs | 23:39:47 |
hexa | right | 23:39:58 |
hexa | the whole thing should wait for fridhs approval | 23:40:07 |
Artturin | python3Packages dont currently show up in nixos search because it references python3.packages without recursing | 23:40:53 |
Artturin | while python39Packages recurses | 23:40:57 |
Artturin | so it shows in the search | 23:41:06 |
hexa | we recurse into the attrsets that hydra is supposed to build | 23:41:21 |
Artturin | (AFAIU btw) | 23:41:37 |