!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

171 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>62 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
12 Oct 2023
@andreas.schraegle:helsinki-systems.deAndreas Schrägle left the room.22:24:38
13 Oct 2023
@toddgamblin:matrix.orgtgamblin changed their profile picture.22:25:06
18 Oct 2023
@hubofeverything:bark.lgbtHubble the Wolverine (they/them) joined the room.16:52:34
@hubofeverything:bark.lgbtHubble the Wolverine (they/them)Heya! I've been redirected to here for a question A PR of mine wasn't able to be built on ofborg but I could on my end. I even tried on a separate machine then my laptop (albeit sharing a little bit of the same configuration) and it was able to build it. I don't understand why https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/260812#issuecomment-176675080216:54:52
@thubrecht:matrix.orgthubrecht joined the room.17:02:40
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hSmells like a networking issue. Attempting to reproduce on my local machine, but fetching the source from blender is so slow x)17:02:58
@hubofeverything:bark.lgbtHubble the Wolverine (they/them)
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
Smells like a networking issue. Attempting to reproduce on my local machine, but fetching the source from blender is so slow x)
Ohhhh yeah, I know how that feels. I've been working on PR for blender and the source fetching is always the longest
17:04:55
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco I submitted a "approved" review and wanted ofborg to build a test, so I put @ofborg test grow-partition in the review comment. Doesn't appear to have picked it up. Am I correct in assuming it only picks up regular comments? Should I just repeat the comment? 17:31:14
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hWhich PR? (Just so I can check if it appeared in the logs)17:31:56
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/26144917:32:02
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hAh yeah, it seems it indeed doesn't check review comments for the purpose of looking for commands.17:33:32
@hubofeverything:bark.lgbtHubble the Wolverine (they/them)
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
Smells like a networking issue. Attempting to reproduce on my local machine, but fetching the source from blender is so slow x)
Looks like ofborg was able to build it this time
17:33:54
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hCool, maybe EM had an IPv6-resolution-hiccup in their networking.17:35:12
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
I submitted a "approved" review and wanted ofborg to build a test, so I put @ofborg test grow-partition in the review comment. Doesn't appear to have picked it up. Am I correct in assuming it only picks up regular comments? Should I just repeat the comment?
(So yeah, submit another "normal" comment with the command and it should be picked up as normal)
17:35:28
20 Oct 2023
@ninjatrappeur:alternativebit.frNinjaTrappeur changed their display name from NinjaTrappeur to PicNoir (was Ninjatrappeur).10:33:57
21 Oct 2023
@zseri:matrix.org@zseri:matrix.org left the room.19:14:51
23 Oct 2023
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát

nix.ci name isn't used much anymore, right? (even though occasionally referenced)

The whole .ci TLD has broken DNSSEC right now, so it isn't accessible by default to some users. (vast majority in some countries, small minority in others)

09:33:28
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát *

nix.ci name isn't used much anymore, right? (even though occasionally referenced)

The whole .ci TLD has broken DNSSEC right now, so it isn't accessible by default to some users. (vast majority in some countries, small minority in others, and minority globally as well I think)

09:34:11
@globin:toznenetl.chatglobin joined the room.09:52:59
@robin.gloster:matrix.mayflower.deglobin left the room.09:53:04
@globin:toznenetl.chatglobin set a profile picture.14:27:48
24 Oct 2023
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadisk full on the aarch64-darwin builder a few hours ago09:37:13
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/263041/checks?check_run_id=1799413969509:37:18
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaor … 32m ago09:37:26
25 Oct 2023
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinhttps://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/64802:37:27
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinchanged it to update to unstable because of an error (which is in the commit msg)02:49:19
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinHmm03:04:16
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin

---- nix::tests::strict_sandboxing stdout ----
thread 'nix::tests::strict_sandboxing' panicked at '

The run was expected to Fail, but did not.

   | this derivation will be built:
   |   /nix/store/ih4kj08w3x1vavdy40n08qis00ilrbjy-sandbox-violation.drv
   | building '/nix/store/ih4kj08w3x1vavdy40n08qis00ilrbjy-sandbox-violation.drv'...
   | hi
   | /nix/store/002bqs9cx1zavfag41xngiih1f2ari27-sandbox-violation


0 out of 2 required lines matched.

 - Err("access to absolute path")
 - Err("is forbidden in restricted mode")
', ofborg/src/nix.rs:545:13
stack backtrace:
   0: rust_begin_unwind
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
   2: core::panicking::panic_display
             at /build/rustc-1.72.0-src/library/core/src/panicking.rs:150:5
   3: ofborg::nix::tests::assert_run
             at ./src/nix.rs:545:13
   4: ofborg::nix::tests::strict_sandboxing
             at ./src/nix.rs:848:9
   5: ofborg::nix::tests::strict_sandboxing::{{closure}}
             at ./src/nix.rs:841:28
   6: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
             at /build/rustc-1.72.0-src/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.


03:04:27
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinhttps://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/blob/de415d372959b7e6fc6b2f6c95f0c21e5010348d/ofborg/src/nix.rs#L842-L85403:04:53
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinhttps://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/blob/de415d372959b7e6fc6b2f6c95f0c21e5010348d/ofborg/test-srcs/build/default.nix#L19-L2503:08:46

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6