!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

173 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>64 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 Sep 2023
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth) changed their display name from roberth to Robert Hensing (roberth).15:28:25
@rover:aguiarvieira.pt@rover:aguiarvieira.pt left the room.18:36:11
10 Sep 2023
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantmIs ofborg eval dead? My PR has been waiting a while https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/10806314:42:27
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hJust busy. 41 evals in queue: https://ofborg.org/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=1&g0.stacked=0&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2h&g1.expr=ofborg_queue_builder_waiting%7Barch!~%22.*-lowprior%22%7D&g1.tab=1&g1.stacked=0&g1.show_exemplars=0&g1.range_input=2h14:43:11
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterYep, I was just about to say it's just way backed up. I had noticed evals not starting on some of my PRs for a while too14:43:37
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(Also just to be sure, I did confirm that there are still evaluation completion events coming in. It's just really behind)14:48:25
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h(if only Nixpkgs eval was faster)14:51:58
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
(if only Nixpkgs eval was faster)
(one day I'll get annoyed enough to dive into that...)
14:52:19
11 Sep 2023
@asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk@asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk left the room.12:04:13
12 Sep 2023
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.org Lily Foster: Oh no there's weird problems again in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/254435, seems like we really need https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/650 02:30:06
@adam:robins.wtf@adam:robins.wtf changed their display name from adamcstephens (buzz) to adamcstephens 🐝.12:22:28
14 Sep 2023
@asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk@asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk joined the room.09:33:14
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinhttps://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/64221:38:54
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @artturin:matrix.org
https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/642
(I will also second this, I think this is a good PR and a quick look through the diff looked fine to me)
22:35:53
15 Sep 2023
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin cole-h: 00:57:35
19 Sep 2023
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothis there a known issue with ofborg and backport PRs? it doesn't seem to start eval/builds by itself21:59:11
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothe.g. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/25619021:59:24
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterIt does just give it time21:59:42
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hThe eval backlog is large21:59:52
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothwell, after > 1h on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/256182 it never showed up21:59:54
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterWe opted not to have the automated backport workflow start GHAs, which are what usually put the pending status before ofborg gets to it22:00:08
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hIf you look at the URL in the topic, there are 20 PRs in the eval queue.22:00:09
@delroth:delroth.netdelroth cole-h: sure but usually at least it adds the gh check thing to say it started an eval... here it doesn't even do that 22:00:11
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothahhh22:00:16
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothok, that's what confused me, thanks22:00:25
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hYes, that's because GHA cannot trigger on bot-created PRs22:00:28
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(And GHAs don't get run by default for PRs opened by a github token)22:00:31
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hNixpkgs takes 10+ minutes to eval these days, so, yeah 🙃22:00:46
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothfor some reason I never noticed that peculiarity before, thanks22:00:47
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h The workaround most people employ is to open-and-close the PR, which will start GHA 22:00:58

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6