!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

177 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>63 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
27 Oct 2024
@k900:0upti.meK900* Anyone know why an eval didn't get kicked off in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/35149809:07:08
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Anyone know why an eval didn't get kicked off in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351498/commits
(github ate webhook maybe? it's happened sometimes. but someone would probably want to check logs to be sure)
14:42:39
28 Oct 2024
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux) 15:22:58
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem * do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram?
virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux)
15:23:12
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem I can't seem to add additional swap either without getting swapper/0 invoked oom-killer in a nixos test 15:25:36
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem * I can't seem to add additional swap either, getting swapper/0 invoked oom-killer in a nixos test 15:26:12
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem * do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? (what free -h reports)
virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux)
15:27:23
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @phanirithvij:matrix.org
do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux)
can you link the PR you're having trouble with?
16:24:07
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @phanirithvij:matrix.org
do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? (what free -h reports)
virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux)
Afaik they have over 64GB
16:49:30
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossThe problem is multiple things using memory, maybe it'll work with a rerun16:50:35
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolemBut are flaky nixos tests fine?16:51:07
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolemI have a pr for swapspace (a dynamic swap space manager which grows/shrinks disk into swap) And to test it I have to starve the vm to be almost out of memory, but it is occasionally failing the test16:53:00
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem * I have a pr for swapspace (a dynamic swap space manager which grows/shrinks disk into swap) And to test it I have to starve the vm to be almost out of memory (when swapspace beings to work), but it is occasionally failing the test16:53:19
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem * I have a pr for swapspace (a dynamic swap space manager which grows/shrinks disk into swap) And to test it I have to starve the vm to be almost out of memory (when swapspace beings to work), but it is occasionally failing the test and getting oomd16:53:30
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolem * But are flaky nixos tests allowed?16:54:24
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolemhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/34858816:54:49
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @phanirithvij:matrix.org
But are flaky nixos tests allowed?
It depends on what way you mean by flaky. If it fails because the builder OOM's, that's not flaky. That's just the builder being unreliable.
16:55:59
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgloudgolemgot it. I guess I was mistaken about the 129mb limit, thanks16:57:34

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6