OfBorg | 181 Members | |
| Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD> | 63 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Apr 2023 | ||
| * And the only reason I'm testing this with ofborg is because I can't reproduce it locally on any machines anymore... (I did one time and have been unable to since, but it's reliably reproduced in ofborg but only on x86_64-linux... it's weird) | 16:39:02 | |
| (really though don't bother spending time on resurrecting that link -- it's not that important and they asked for a new log anyway) | 16:40:24 | |
| Gotcha. Sorry about that. If you remind me on Monday I can try to reproduce the issue on one of the boxes directly | 16:45:40 | |
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org Will let you know! I'm currently just pushing an update to the PR while it's marked draft that print out the log they need and letting it run on x86_64-linux (then nabbing the log from the Is there actually any way to avoid the ofborg eval step when doing that? (so that I'm not putting spurious stuff in the eval queue that I really just want a quick build for?) | 16:51:37 | |
| no afaik, we have https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/blob/released/ofborg/src/tasks/evaluate.rs#L576 but that only affects builds | 17:00:52 | |
| Oh great the build succeeded this time in ofborg on x86_64-linux. Heisenbug I guess 🫠 | 17:04:02 | |
In reply to @lily:lily.flowersYou can't prevent the eval, but you can tell ofborg to manually build the attr(s) you want and that should happen independently of the eval step. | 17:34:17 | |
e.g. @ofborg build asdf will build asdf even if there's an eval happening at the same time | 17:35:03 | |
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers* You can't prevent the eval, but you can tell ofborg to manually build the attr(s) you want and that will happen independently of the eval step. | 17:35:08 | |
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.orgYeah I did actually do that. Just didn't want clog up the eval queue (especially since it was backing up a bit the last few days -- seems better today though) | 17:36:06 | |
| Eval queue should get eaten through fairly fast. The evals themselves may be slow but the machines are fast enough that it shouldn't ever grow to an unmanageable number (unlike the Darwin build queues lol) | 17:37:05 | |
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.orgYeah not unmanageable. It was just getting pretty slow to start evaluating PRs yesterday and the day before (but it did eventually catch up) | 17:38:41 | |
| Just wanted to avoid the cost if I easily could but it's not that big of a deal. Thank you though! | 17:40:54 | |
| 18:09:26 | ||
| 20:57:16 | ||
| 21:59:02 | ||
| 23:10:58 | ||
| 9 Apr 2023 | ||
| Redacted or Malformed Event | 13:26:04 | |
| Redacted or Malformed Event | 13:26:14 | |
| 14:45:16 | ||
|
| 14:46:30 | |
| See yesterday discussion | 14:47:15 | |
| * See yesterdays discussion | 14:47:25 | |
In reply to @artturin:matrix.orgoh, my bad. ty | 14:47:52 | |
| *
| 14:48:34 | |
| 10 Apr 2023 | ||
| the logviewer still wants to read from logs.nix.ci | 13:20:59 | |
| 13:21:11 | |
| ...right, cuz the repo for that is separate from ofborg itself. OK, one moment. | 13:22:05 | |
| Try now? | 13:24:53 | |
| Can we make ofborg scream if a PR with, say, 2000 or more rebuilds targets master? | 13:26:11 | |