!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

171 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>63 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
3 Nov 2024
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221Could we move some aarch64-linux builder as evaluator09:20:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexano, we can't magic resources into existance15:04:32
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
Could we move some aarch64-linux builder as evaluator
I think this has already been talked about.
15:20:34
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossLooking at the Prometheus graph, we really are lacking that bad with aarch64-darwin?15:39:47
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens Have been for a long timeĀ  17:23:27
@zi0p4tch0:matrix.orgMatteo Pacini changed their profile picture.21:50:27
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
I think this has already been talked about.
So what, we have more aarch64-linux builder that we need. There's no tasks wating for aarch64-linux. Anyway, evaluator is more meaningful than builder. We can run nixpkgs-review locally but without ofborg. It's really slow. It takes about 1 hour on my computer.
23:48:33
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
So what, we have more aarch64-linux builder that we need. There's no tasks wating for aarch64-linux. Anyway, evaluator is more meaningful than builder. We can run nixpkgs-review locally but without ofborg. It's really slow. It takes about 1 hour on my computer.
Idk, using aarch64-linux to eval for aarch64-darwin doesn't feel right lol. Ideally it should evaluate the same but what if it doesn't?
23:52:29
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossThe better solution would probably be to get rid of some aarch64-linux machines replace them with Darwin ones.23:53:48
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Idk, using aarch64-linux to eval for aarch64-darwin doesn't feel right lol. Ideally it should evaluate the same but what if it doesn't?
It is better to have it than there's no. It should be a bug in nix if we have different result if we evaluate on x86 and darwin. Anyway, if you are really worried about this. We can just run them in qemu.
23:55:59
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
The better solution would probably be to get rid of some aarch64-linux machines replace them with Darwin ones.
I think the most serious problem is about evaluator
23:56:53
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Idk, using aarch64-linux to eval for aarch64-darwin doesn't feel right lol. Ideally it should evaluate the same but what if it doesn't?
*
23:57:16
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
It is better to have it than there's no. It should be a bug in nix if we have different result if we evaluate on x86 and darwin. Anyway, if you are really worried about this. We can just run them in qemu.
You can't emulate Darwin without breaking the terms
23:57:31
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossSo that's a no23:57:38
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
You can't emulate Darwin without breaking the terms
I mean aarch64. Sorry for wrong typing
23:57:53
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossThe system name holds both the arch and OS so still that could introduce problems if there is a bug.23:58:50
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221How about run a full VM?23:59:26
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221Anyway, I don't think we should discuss about a bug which doesn't know if it exist.23:59:50
4 Nov 2024
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossStill can't emulate aarch64-darwin 00:00:04
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221So could we solve the problem of evaluator?00:00:34
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
Anyway, I don't think we should discuss about a bug which doesn't know if it exist.
Afaik, @k900:0upti.me has mentioned impurities but idk if that affects the evaluator
00:00:43
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221

Tristan RossRun a full VM will solve it.

00:01:22
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221Even though it is really slow, it is better than nothing.00:01:48
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org

Tristan RossRun a full VM will solve it.

Of aarch64-darwin?
00:02:35
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Of aarch64-darwin?
I mean evaluate on aarch64-linux
00:03:02
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
So could we solve the problem of evaluator?
Get more aarch64-darwin machines
00:03:07
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
I mean evaluate on aarch64-linux
Ok but if there are impurities problems then that would still cause issues
00:03:30
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossAnd emulation isn't the solution 00:03:44
@bot-wxt1221:matrix.orgBot_wxt1221So we can run x86_64-linux VM on aarch64-linux00:03:48
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossToo inefficient 00:03:50

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6