| 17 Jul 2024 |
 linj | It seems that I cannot trigger a new eval https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/327946#issuecomment-2233747662 | 16:51:05 |
| linj | It's waiting in the queue, I guess | 16:53:20 |
| 20 Jul 2024 |
 aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | ofborg build on x86_64-darwin and aarch64-darwin seems not working in a few days? | 00:58:01 |
 hexa | has been behind since 2024/07/07 | 01:26:25 |
| hexa | 
Download image.png | 01:26:40 |
 vcunat | Maybe a timeout would be nice, as too old tasks probably aren't very useful to build anymore. | 06:40:17 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
image.png So it's actually working? | 07:38:13 |
| hexa | to some degree | 11:27:24 |
| 22 Jul 2024 |
 trofi | Another day, another eval failure regression of .tests attribute: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/329253 | 21:44:25 |
| 23 Jul 2024 |
|  Ezzobir Bezziou joined the room. | 08:22:46 |
| 26 Jul 2024 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | ofBorg marking some seemingly wrong "10.rebuild-darwin: 0" and "10.rebuild-linux: 0" and not building anything on some PRs:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330029
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330018
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330024 | 14:24:04 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | Is this because they opened too many pull requests in a short period of time? | 14:24:22 |
 7c6f434c | It is notable that all three of the PRs touch packages with an empty or unspecified maintainer list | 14:27:14 |
| 7c6f434c | Maybe there are no rev-deps with non-empty maintainer list? | 14:30:52 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | In reply to @7c6f434c:nitro.chat
It is notable that all three of the PRs touch packages with an empty or unspecified maintainer list Is this a new feature or always is? | 14:31:59 |
| 7c6f434c | I remember that the first version of implicit packages set traversal for Hydra required specifying platforms and (non-empty) maintainers (years ago)… | 14:34:09 |
| 7c6f434c | Hmmm, not sure if that check ends up used by OfBorg, actually | 14:43:50 |
| 7c6f434c | (Also not sure into which package sets it recurses) | 14:44:18 |
| hexa | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
and core.ofborg.org has no AAAA record set up cole-h: please? | 15:16:23 |
 cole-h | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
cole-h: please? Oops sorry I missed that. Added, should see it when DNS propagation decides to do its thing | 15:32:43 |
| 28 Jul 2024 |
| linj | any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 | 13:32:21 |
| linj | nixpkgs-review gives me 0 rebuilds | 13:32:33 |
| linj | * any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 | 13:32:55 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | In reply to @me:linj.tech
any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 I also saw this in @sigmanificient's PR, which is just cleaning up some unused variables | 13:33:43 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330312 | 13:35:21 |
 Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311459 | 13:38:27 |
| Artturin | Left a comment | 13:40:06 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | I’ll take a look tomorrow 📈 | 20:54:57 |
|  felixalb joined the room. | 21:42:59 |
 Tristan Ross | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330567 https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/51de36ad23c7e099c946432d2e3120eb weird error and `@ofborg eval` didn't do anything at all. | 21:43:24 |
