!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

173 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>64 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 Mar 2024
@mjolnir:nixos.orgNixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels.18:03:22
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org left the room.20:07:50
23 Mar 2024
@federicodschonborn:matrix.org@federicodschonborn:matrix.org joined the room.00:37:49
4 Apr 2024
@stablejoy:matrix.org@stablejoy:matrix.org joined the room.06:09:56
@fabaff:matrix.orgFabian Affolter changed their display name from Fabian Affolter to fabaff.08:40:28
5 Apr 2024
@superherointj:matrix.orgsuperherointj changed their display name from superherointj to superherointj 🤑.13:45:47
@superherointj:matrix.orgsuperherointj changed their display name from superherointj 🤑 to superherointj 💥.13:46:54
@superherointj:matrix.orgsuperherointj changed their display name from superherointj 💥 to superherointj 👨‍💻.13:47:24
@superherointj:matrix.orgsuperherointj changed their display name from superherointj 👨‍💻 to superherointj 🐴.13:48:49
6 Apr 2024
@superherointj:matrix.orgsuperherointj changed their display name from superherointj 🐴 to superherointj.15:25:17
8 Apr 2024
@a-n-n-a-l-e-e:matrix.org@a-n-n-a-l-e-e:matrix.org left the room.23:11:13
10 Apr 2024
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat7c6f434chttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/302937 — uhm. I am not 100% sure «by: package-maintainer» should be set in this specific case, and definitely «by: package-maintainer» while not mentioning the previous maintainer is unfortunate. Am I missing something? (For the record: I approve of the changes in the PR and of the change in maintainer list, I just think it should be labelled/review-requested differently)14:37:24
@me:indeednotjames.comemilyeval fails for (what looks like) all new PRs with https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/455a82c8ebc61cdd44e3a3f5c31502ea and I can't make out what caused this 👀19:19:31
@me:indeednotjames.comemily(eval using nixpkgs-review is not failing)19:21:06
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosteri'm trying to investigate but trying to search through recent nixpkgs PRs is giving me 500 errors on github... (yayyyy)19:22:36
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hI don't know why, but https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/303150 makes me kinda suspicious19:22:55
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinmerge seems to match the beginning of errors19:23:45
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h(didn't wait for ofborg statuses so I can't be certain yet, bogarting one of the ofborg machines to trial an eval with that reverted)19:25:06
@k900:0upti.meK900Oh god19:26:07
@k900:0upti.meK900Does it trigger some weird Darwin codepath somewhere19:26:14
@k900:0upti.meK900Howst19:26:22
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Howst
i'm doing outpath eval now to check
19:26:37
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
i'm doing outpath eval now to check
It's a race then! 😆
19:26:52
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
It's a race then! 😆
yeah i started mine before you stole an ofborg evaluator
19:27:09
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterbut the ofborg evaluators are much nicer so might finish first19:27:22
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-heval is single-threaded anyways so I think the only benefit will be the 256GiB of memory lol19:28:12
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
eval is single-threaded anyways so I think the only benefit will be the 256GiB of memory lol
exactly, i'm about to be swapping here in a minute :)
19:28:25
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(also am on laptop on battery. maybe i should fix the on-battery part)19:28:42
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hLast time I tried on my machine and was swapping (without zram at the time, though) it didn't even finish in 12 hours so... Good luck? 😆19:29:01
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosteroooof19:29:07

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6