!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

170 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>63 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
2 Mar 2024
@gabriella439:matrix.org@gabriella439:matrix.org

ofborg labeled my PR with ofborg-internal-error and seems stuck: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/282401

I'm not sure how I proceed or diagnose this

01:13:09
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius if you send @ofborg eval again, you can retrigger the eval 01:13:23
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusofborg can be quite slow yes01:13:37
@gabriella439:matrix.org@gabriella439:matrix.orgDo I need to remove the label?01:13:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI believe ofborg will remove it by itself once it succeed01:13:53
@gabriella439:matrix.org@gabriella439:matrix.orgalright, thanks!01:14:00
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
I believe ofborg will remove it by itself once it succeed
it does not, cole or someone removes it after they check on it in the backend
01:45:30
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterdo not remove it manually though (it's just technically not automatic)01:45:55
@adamjedrzejewski:matrix.orgadamjedrzejewski joined the room.14:26:08
6 Mar 2024
@delroth:delroth.net@delroth:delroth.netlinks to ofborg on github still sometimes link to nix.ci fyi: e.g. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/291604/checks?check_run_id=22258503849 the "View more details on OfBorg" link at the bottom01:53:22
@gabriella439:matrix.org@gabriella439:matrix.org left the room.23:57:13
11 Mar 2024
@k900:0upti.meK900Did anyone change anything about the log viewer?18:41:12
@k900:0upti.meK900It just hard locks my Firefox now18:41:20
@k900:0upti.meK900I think it might be the Firefox18:41:25
@k900:0upti.meK900OK updated Firefox and it seems fine now18:42:58
@k900:0upti.meK900Sorry for the false alarm18:43:02
13 Mar 2024
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephenshttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/295539/checks?check_run_id=2261653763017:20:18
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensthis is confusing. especially since the package does in fact build fine on aarch64-darwin17:20:32
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensahh it's the tests17:23:33
14 Mar 2024
@mjolnir:nixos.orgNixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels.18:45:07
15 Mar 2024
@0x4a6f:matrix.org[0x4A6F]
In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
this is confusing. especially since the package does in fact build fine on aarch64-darwin

Yeah, I think something is broken: https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/issues/677
also:

  • https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/296054/checks?check_run_id=22718871082
  • https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/296054/checks?check_run_id=22690415200
19:01:21
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterthat may be a nixpkgs bug. i'm not doing much else atm, so i'll investigate though19:02:56
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster i wonder if it's because these things have nixos tests in passthru.tests and eval isn't failing like it did before? 19:04:48
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster okay so https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/282401 may have broken it. i'm testing now 19:08:09
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster okay actually a nixpkgs issue already exists: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/294725 19:08:38
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster so does anyone have opinions on if we just add a nixpkgs config.disableDarwinNixOSTests to make https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/795c30faca6c5c7f1296696ad8fce17e2865bafd/nixos/lib/testing/nodes.nix#L19 throw for any darwin system instead of just mismatched darwin/linux architectures? 19:17:23
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster maybe i should ask in #dev:nixos.org for wider audience 19:17:38
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org joined the room.23:45:57
19 Mar 2024
@mjolnir:nixos.orgNixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels.00:30:27
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco Lily Foster: agh; are we not supposed to @ofborg test on staging PRs? I wasn't thinking and may have asked it to do a big build that I shouldn't have... https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/297077 02:56:59

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6