| 25 Jan 2024 |
 7c6f434c | (if it is just about updating a few versions) | 20:12:04 |
| 7c6f434c | Or, indeed, write a script in whatever you prefer that outputs the expression as you wish | 20:12:34 |
| 7c6f434c | Presumably you already have it in your IFD setup | 20:12:57 |
| 28 Jan 2024 |
 K900 | Does ofborg push built outputs somewhere? | 13:36:24 |
|  nf changed their profile picture. | 14:04:00 |
| 29 Jan 2024 |
 cole-h | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Does ofborg push built outputs somewhere? No, it does not. | 15:51:48 |
| 31 Jan 2024 |
|  @asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk left the room. | 10:47:14 |
| 3 Feb 2024 |
 hexa | the current eval speed is refreshing | 02:41:05 |
| hexa | thanks alot | 02:41:07 |
| hexa | * thanks a ton | 02:41:10 |
| 9 Feb 2024 |
|  pinpox joined the room. | 12:04:08 |
| pinpox | crossposting here as requested:
ofborg is failing to run my test, even though it works fine locally. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/7843526136/job/21404048992?pr=287455 | 12:04:29 |
 Artturin | In reply to @pinpox:matrix.org
crossposting here as requested:
ofborg is failing to run my test, even though it works fine locally. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/7843526136/job/21404048992?pr=287455 That's not ofborg, it's https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/workflows/nix-parse.yml | 13:41:05 |
| Artturin | Add the test to the passthru.tests of the package btw | 13:45:57 |
| Artturin | pinpox: it passes now | 15:20:13 |
| Artturin | check the darwin failure and drop the merge | 15:20:35 |
| pinpox | Artturin: I removed the merge but now it conflicts again | 20:59:30 |
| pinpox | I'm not sure how to resolve this | 20:59:43 |
| Artturin | In reply to @pinpox:matrix.org
Artturin: I removed the merge but now it conflicts again conflicts should be resolved via rebasing | 21:00:49 |
| Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#how-to-create-pull-requests 7. | 21:01:00 |
| Artturin | In reply to @pinpox:matrix.org
Artturin: I removed the merge but now it conflicts again * conflicts should be resolved by rebasing | 21:01:43 |
| pinpox | Artturin: got it fixed, thanks! | 21:06:35 |
| pinpox | * Artturin: got it fixed, thanks! Rebased and without conflicts now | 21:06:44 |
| 12 Feb 2024 |
 @infinisil:matrix.org | Regarding https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/269403, I actually don't think it would improve ofborg speed at all | 00:53:17 |
| @infinisil:matrix.org | * Regarding https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/269403, I actually don't think it would improve ofborg eval speed at all | 00:53:21 |
| @infinisil:matrix.org | It gives a 5x speedup if you have 31 additional cores without anything to do | 00:53:55 |
| @infinisil:matrix.org | Well I guess it depends on how booked-out ofborg generally is | 00:54:42 |
| @infinisil:matrix.org | Because if it's already using 32 cores for 32 separate evaluations, that PR would not help at all (in fact it would make it a lot worse, because each parallel unit of work duplicates work..) | 00:55:42 |
| cole-h | ofborg does not use 32 cores for 32 evaluations 😆
It only has enough memory to run 3 evaluations on one machine most times. (256GiB total, each eval-outpaths takes ~60+GiB of memory.) | 15:03:16 |
| cole-h | So, provided there's no huge build taking place on the same box, the other cores are usually sitting around twiddling their thumbs. | 15:04:13 |
