| 19 Nov 2023 |
| pbsds changed their display name from pbsds (federation borken, may not see reply) to pbsds. | 20:38:46 |
| 21 Nov 2023 |
raitobezarius | can someone force re-eval here? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/265924 | 12:34:55 |
raitobezarius | I tried @ofborg eval | 12:35:00 |
raitobezarius | Also the lib tests is fucking flakey almost broken? | 12:35:20 |
Lily Foster | how long ago? eval queue looks pretty deep rn | 12:35:28 |
raitobezarius | I reproduced the failure locally and after enough retries, it passed? | 12:35:28 |
raitobezarius | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers how long ago? eval queue looks pretty deep rn few minutes ago | 12:35:35 |
raitobezarius | Alright will wait | 12:35:37 |
Lily Foster | yeah, eval queue has 23 waiting, just give in an hour | 12:36:11 |
@linus:schreibt.jetzt | raitobezarius: is the problem maybe the PR title? nixVersions.2_3 isn't an attribute path you can have unquoted iirc, and it's also not the name of the package | 12:36:13 |
@linus:schreibt.jetzt | s/name/attrpath/ | 12:36:29 |
raitobezarius | though the failure here is about a broken Nix store, no? https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285 | 12:36:58 |
raitobezarius | I don't see any missing attribute name | 12:37:03 |
@linus:schreibt.jetzt | that's not eval though | 12:37:18 |
Lily Foster | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org Also the lib tests is fucking flakey almost broken? it was actually a test on the nix package: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285#file-ofborg-eval-lib-tests-L1611 | 12:37:45 |
raitobezarius | but wouldn't "Complete, with errors" mean that the evaluation is OK but some of the "evaluation tests" failed? | 12:37:50 |
Lily Foster | * it was actually a test on the nix package: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285#file-ofborg-eval-lib-tests-L1611 | 12:37:52 |
raitobezarius | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers it was actually a test on the nix package: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285#file-ofborg-eval-lib-tests-L1611 how do you know if it's nix 2.3, nix 2.13 or nix 2.18 ? | 12:38:17 |
raitobezarius | given nix 2.18 is still building during failures | 12:38:38 |
raitobezarius | it's either Nix 2.3 or Nix 2.13 | 12:38:41 |
raitobezarius | error: 1 dependencies of derivation '/nix/store/q9sy9gm77sj1dlln90qjxr58s2pc098x-nixpkgs-lib-tests-nix-2.3.17.drv' failed to build
| 12:39:01 |
raitobezarius | it's nix 2.3 yep | 12:39:03 |
Lily Foster | yeah i knew i saw the drv name somewhere | 12:39:14 |
Lily Foster | glad you found it. i'm on mobile and was trying to search | 12:39:24 |
raitobezarius | but locally I reproduced it for Nix 2.18 too | 12:39:48 |
raitobezarius | the failure | 12:39:50 |
raitobezarius | which started to make me very confused now | 12:39:58 |
Lily Foster | this line is yhe actual drv that failed: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/8c7705fdef8ee5b57863a2127be92285#file-ofborg-eval-lib-tests-L1699 | 12:40:03 |
raitobezarius | yep | 12:40:19 |
Lily Foster | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org which started to make me very confused now maybe the hydra runners are just built different and the test doesn't fail there, and it just gets substituted | 12:40:41 |