!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

173 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>64 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
16 Jul 2023
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster

You can replicate this one particular issue with nix-env --query --available --no-name --attr-path --out-path --option extra-experimental-features no-url-literals -f . -A stdenv yourself though (no obscenely large amount of RAM required)

I am admittedly just guessing though since running ofborg one-off is still not currently supported and I'm just manually running the nix commands that it does and inspecting code

11:22:36
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(cole just seems to be out for the next few weeks, so I figured I'd help a bit since I'm not sure who else would be able to get ofborg logs)11:23:00
@piegames:matrix.orgpiegamesDoes ofborg automatically remove the "internal error" label or should I do it manually?14:09:53
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlIt does remove it automatically, if it stays then the ofborg maintainer will sometimes have a look at the related logs14:12:25
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin
In reply to @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl
It does remove it automatically, if it stays then the ofborg maintainer will sometimes have a look at the related logs
It's not removed automatically
14:34:01
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinNever seen it happen 14:34:49
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlHmm15:02:49
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlAt lease Cole said he'd like it if they are kept, not sure about autoremoval otherwise 15:03:14
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat7c6f434cI have assumed the label is treated as «an open OfBorg issue» with removal triggered manually 15:06:12
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧So, when do we turn failed checks red instead of grey?22:15:37
17 Jul 2023
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinMaybe we could try it on non-staging PRs and see what issues come up01:24:03
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofi left the room.06:09:53
18 Jul 2023
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat7c6f434cIs there any code deployed that tracks timeout/transient failures (network, ENOSPC)/dep failures/direct failures? Maybe its output should be the last line of failure log? It would be useful on its own when build logs are numerous enough for confusion, and without such code red checks are a glaringly obvious bad idea08:06:00
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧It would probably already be enough if the logs wouldn't be combined08:53:20
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat7c6f434cProperly choosing best last ten lines for a lots-of-small-stuff build is hard, a summary of which kinds of failures were present is useful, and it's a clear prerequisite for red checks anyway08:55:00
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧Last x lines are not always useful, eg pytest shows the failure summary there which is usually not enough to provide anything other than that failed08:56:54
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat7c6f434cFor a single build at least you know it is a pytest failure…08:58:09
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl
In reply to @7c6f434c:nitro.chat
Is there any code deployed that tracks timeout/transient failures (network, ENOSPC)/dep failures/direct failures? Maybe its output should be the last line of failure log? It would be useful on its own when build logs are numerous enough for confusion, and without such code red checks are a glaringly obvious bad idea
I don't think so
17:50:55
19 Jul 2023
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.org joined the room.11:12:15
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.orgHi, I'm trying to figure out what (and why?) is ofboring doing for over 25 hours when it's not even building a package because it's for Linux only and that ofborg runner is Darwin.17:03:16
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.orghttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/244160/files17:03:23
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.orgimage.png
Download image.png
17:03:49
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.org * Hi, I'm trying to figure out what (and why?) is ofboring doing for over 27 hours when it's not even building a package because it's for Linux only and that ofborg runner is Darwin.17:04:01
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlTrying to find out that it won't eval on Darwin...17:04:30
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.organd why does it take over a day?17:04:51
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.orgx86_64-darwin went pretty fast, aarch64-darwin on the other hand...17:05:35
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinbecause the builders are overloaded 17:05:38
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin * probably because the builders are overloaded 17:05:41
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin * probably because the builders have a big queu17:06:07
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinalso possible it's just stuck17:06:12

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6