| 21 Jun 2023 |
 raitobezarius | I don't think ofborg uses nix-eval-jobs, right? | 16:10:41 |
| raitobezarius | I feel like it has better controls for memory consumption of each workers | 16:10:49 |
 cole-h | Correct, it uses plain ole nix-eval | 16:13:02 |
| cole-h | Sheesh, even with 9 total evaluators, it's still not shrinking..... | 17:27:36 |
| cole-h | Guys, I'm announcing a temporary pause on Nixpkgs PRs please stop ðŸ˜
(Kidding, it'll settle down eventually...) | 17:37:40 |
 Sandro | hold my beer | 17:43:29 |
| cole-h | * Guys, I'm announcing a temporary pause on Nixpkgs PRs please stop ðŸ˜
(Kidding, it'll settle down eventually...) (I hope...............) | 17:43:43 |
| raitobezarius | I think trying nix-eval-jobs can mitigate the problem in a serious fashion | 18:16:26 |
| raitobezarius | I cannot hack a PR right now though | 18:16:35 |
| raitobezarius | It's probably time to do a serious look on cgroup accounting for nix workers | 18:17:14 |
 hexa | opened a PR | 23:56:16 |
| hexa | ofborg was the first check I saw | 23:56:27 |
| hexa | cloning | 23:56:31 |
| hexa | 😠| 23:56:43 |
| hexa | I want this speed always! 😄 | 23:56:56 |
| hexa | heh, did I misread? Now it says pending agin | 23:57:29 |
| hexa | * heh, did I misread? Now it says pending again 😲 | 23:57:32 |
| hexa | nope, it was that quick | 23:57:50 |
| 24 Jun 2023 |
|  kadawee joined the room. | 15:59:36 |
| 25 Jun 2023 |
|  @rasmus:rend.al left the room. | 13:56:35 |
| 26 Jun 2023 |
 trofi | ofborg started failing with internal errors somewhat frequently: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Aofborg-internal-error | 08:49:00 |
 K900 (deprecated) | Github is having a moment again I think | 08:52:01 |
| K900 (deprecated) | Some pages are barely loading form e | 08:52:08 |
| K900 (deprecated) | * Some pages are barely loading for me | 08:52:10 |
| 28 Jun 2023 |
| trofi | In https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/239881 running @ofborg eval was enough to get rid of ofborg-internal-error. Is it intentional that internal error label does not get removed automatically? | 07:02:31 |
| trofi | * In https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/239881 running @ofborg eval was enough to get rid of ofborg-internal-error condition (but not label). Is it intentional that internal error label does not get removed automatically? | 07:02:47 |
 Artturin | In reply to @trofi:matrix.org
In https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/239881 running @ofborg eval was enough to get rid of ofborg-internal-error condition (but not label). Is it intentional that internal error label does not get removed automatically? Yes, so a ofborg maintainer can check it | 07:04:54 |
| cole-h | (Which, to be fair, I've been bad about recently... but also to be fair, usually it's GH's API and not ofborg) | 13:33:00 |
 figsoda | tbh I've just been removing the label, should I keep the label and not remove it? | 13:37:28 |
| cole-h | It doesn't affect anything (other than telling you you'll want to @ofborg eval again), so if you wouldn't mind, please leave it :) | 13:38:01 |
