!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

166 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>60 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
13 Jun 2023
@k900:conduit.0upti.meK900 (deprecated) joined the room.21:45:16
14 Jun 2023
@raphi:tapesoftware.netraphi changed their display name from raphi (element unread channel fix when) to raphi.07:03:04
@me:indeednotjames.comemily
In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
Seems like scaleway allows 1 mac per customer

we could try contacting their support asking for an quota increase I guess? maybe?

excerpt from https://www.scaleway.com/en/docs/console/my-account/reference-content/account-quotas/

To increase a specific quota, you must contact our support team.

10:15:04
15 Jun 2023
@me:indeednotjames.comemily how many aarch64-darwin builders do we need though?
I wouldn't be surprised if buying them directly from apple and throwing them in some colocation would be cheaper 👀
15:31:41
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinhttps://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/64215:56:42
16 Jun 2023
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hI'll take a look at that after https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/645.17:34:27
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hFYI: redeploying ofborg to pick up the above PR, please report any weirdness you may notice :)17:34:53
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlThe dot throws element off 😅17:39:19
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin
In reply to @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl
The dot throws element off 😅
only mobile
17:41:26
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlOh :)17:43:23
19 Jun 2023
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI'm seeing >10hrs "waiting to check" delays on ofborg for aarch64-darwin I think01:41:02
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusas I like to merge with all status checks, this is blocking all my merges :D01:41:13
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaimage.png
Download image.png
04:45:17
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h"Awesome", I'll look when I wake up04:45:47
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hOK, should start shrinking now. Sigh.13:59:28
20 Jun 2023
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantmr-ryantm has been waiting 4 hrs for ofborg to evaluator.messages to get low enough to make a PR.23:32:28
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahave evaluations become much more costly and/or has the pr volume grown so much23:34:21
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hMaybe related? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/22794523:35:24
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hI'll see about scaling up the number of machines tomorrow23:36:35
21 Jun 2023
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát Yesterday I reverted some changes that even lead to crashes due to too expensive evaluation, but I don't know if that's really related. (commit 205ee073b05) 12:35:38
@wegank:matrix.orgWeijia joined the room.13:16:45
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hAdding one machine shortly, may add another if it doesn't shrink the queue as much as I'm hoping.15:56:30
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI don't think ofborg uses nix-eval-jobs, right?16:10:41
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI feel like it has better controls for memory consumption of each workers16:10:49
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h Correct, it uses plain ole nix-eval 16:13:02
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hSheesh, even with 9 total evaluators, it's still not shrinking.....17:27:36
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hGuys, I'm announcing a temporary pause on Nixpkgs PRs please stop 😭 (Kidding, it'll settle down eventually...)17:37:40
@sandro:supersandro.deSandrohold my beer17:43:29
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h * Guys, I'm announcing a temporary pause on Nixpkgs PRs please stop 😭 (Kidding, it'll settle down eventually...) (I hope...............)17:43:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI think trying nix-eval-jobs can mitigate the problem in a serious fashion18:16:26

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6