!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

166 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>60 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
8 Apr 2023
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaqueue at 2516:06:14
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hyep16:06:38
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h changed the room topic to "Number of builds and evals in queue: https://ofborg.org/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=1&g0.stacked=0&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2h&g1.expr=ofborg_queue_builder_waiting%7Barch!~%22.*-lowprior%22%7D&g1.tab=1&g1.stacked=0&g1.show_exemplars=0&g1.range_input=2h" from "Number of builds and evals in queue: https://nix.ci/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=1&g0.stacked=0&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2h&g1.expr=ofborg_queue_builder_waiting%7Barch!~%22.*-lowprior%22%7D&g1.tab=1&g1.stacked=0&g1.show_exemplars=0&g1.range_input=1w".16:07:19
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hUpdated topic with new URL for the moment.16:07:38
@k900:0upti.meK900Too bad you can't get ofb.org16:13:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexabecause it already hosts this very important other website16:14:14
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI thought exactly about that when ofborg.org appeared here.16:14:57
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
ofborg.org.org.org.org.org
cough
16:15:15
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunátorg.org is already taken, apparently. No idea if deeper layers are "available".16:16:42
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
I'll try to collect a list of PRs that happened between ofborg's untimely demise and get them re-eval'd, but if I miss any, don't hesitate to @ofborg eval!
This does mean that old PRs' logs.nix.ci links will likely remain dead, but they might work if you change the URL to use logs.ofborg.org.
I can confirm real quick that just changing the URL from nix.ci to ofborg.org did not work (at least not for the one I tried). Which is a tad unfortunate because I linked a log in an upstream issue report yesterday (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-rs/-/issues/337), but it's not that big of a deal really (since I saved a copy regardless and can produce it if really needed)
16:35:58
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hCan you send me the link? (Also, those links are extremely ephemeral, please don't rely on them to stick around for any length of time.)16:36:43
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
Can you send me the link?
(Also, those links are extremely ephemeral, please don't rely on them to stick around for any length of time.)

I knew they were ephemeral. I only expected it up to be long enough for upstream to look at if they cared enough (which is also why I saved a copy)

Link was https://logs.nix.ci/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.225143&attempt_id=e780960b-b5a3-4abf-aad9-adab9b8a28cf

16:38:15
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterAnd the only reason I'm testing this with ofborg is because I can't reproduce it locally on any machines anymore... (I did one time and have been unable to since, but it's reliably reproduce in ofborg but only on x86_64-linux... it's weird)16:38:58
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster * And the only reason I'm testing this with ofborg is because I can't reproduce it locally on any machines anymore... (I did one time and have been unable to since, but it's reliably reproduced in ofborg but only on x86_64-linux... it's weird) 16:39:02
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(really though don't bother spending time on resurrecting that link -- it's not that important and they asked for a new log anyway)16:40:24
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h Gotcha. Sorry about that. If you remind me on Monday I can try to reproduce the issue on one of the boxes directly 16:45:40
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
Gotcha. Sorry about that. If you remind me on Monday I can try to reproduce the issue on one of the boxes directly

Will let you know! I'm currently just pushing an update to the PR while it's marked draft that print out the log they need and letting it run on x86_64-linux (then nabbing the log from the /logfile API and trimming)

Is there actually any way to avoid the ofborg eval step when doing that? (so that I'm not putting spurious stuff in the eval queue that I really just want a quick build for?)

16:51:37
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinno afaik, we have https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/blob/released/ofborg/src/tasks/evaluate.rs#L576 but that only affects builds17:00:52
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterOh great the build succeeded this time in ofborg on x86_64-linux. Heisenbug I guess 🫠17:04:02

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6