!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

169 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: <TBD>64 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
29 Dec 2024
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens There’s the potential for a lot of interesting data, which is what I think Raito was getting at  22:26:38
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßAgreed, yes22:26:55
30 Dec 2024
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross Janne Heß: I saw https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/369102. Will be be able to get generic rebuild labels per arch and not just per OS? I think Lily Foster was working on that before but I don't think that work was completed. 04:25:54
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne Heß
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Janne Heß: I saw https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/369102. Will be be able to get generic rebuild labels per arch and not just per OS? I think Lily Foster was working on that before but I don't think that work was completed.
I have no personal preference on this. I mainly wanted to get the feature out of ofborg to get rid of some evals
09:17:07
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne Heß Jonas Chevalier: do you have time today for moving the DNS records and add the webhook? 09:27:20
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalieryes I'm around09:42:18
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßNeat! I think we can do the webhook right now and do the domain migrations later09:42:42
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne Heßimage.png
Download image.png
09:43:30
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßThis is the webhook now (yes it's still "everything" but it's only on repo level now)09:43:41
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Janne Heß: I saw https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/369102. Will be be able to get generic rebuild labels per arch and not just per OS? I think Lily Foster was working on that before but I don't think that work was completed.
(the work was trivial and completed. it was just never accepted)
11:49:34
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius changed their display name from raitobezarius (DECT: 3538 / EPVPN 2681) to raitobezarius.16:27:21
31 Dec 2024
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßI'll be AFK soon-ish, but fyi: The new evaluators are up, but not the builders. These should already ping package maitnainers, which appears to be waaay faster than the old ofborg (which is still running)09:46:21
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.org
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
I'll be AFK soon-ish, but fyi: The new evaluators are up, but not the builders. These should already ping package maitnainers, which appears to be waaay faster than the old ofborg (which is still running)
I'm a bit suprised actually, there shouldn't be a need for the evaluator anymore with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/366046
09:50:12
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßAww great, I'll throw it back out, then09:50:45
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.orgLike, we said in https://discourse.nixos.org/t/infrastructure-announcement-the-future-of-ofborg-your-help-needed/56025 that eval will be taken care of by GHA, while only building will be taken care of by ofborg going forward 😅09:52:14
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßWell we still kinda need to keep evaluating to figure out what to build since GH's API is horrible so not too much was lost i guess09:53:25
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.org(And https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/355847)09:53:48
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßAre there any plans to migrate the eval checks (nix-instantiate and nix-build) as well? Because these are annoying and I commented them out09:53:56
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.org
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
Are there any plans to migrate the eval checks (nix-instantiate and nix-build) as well? Because these are annoying and I commented them out
Yeah it's not a lot of work
09:54:24
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßI didn't assume it to be a lot of work, but it has to be done regardless :D09:54:44
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.org
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
Well we still kinda need to keep evaluating to figure out what to build since GH's API is horrible so not too much was lost i guess
Not sure I get that
09:55:12
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.orgThe thing GHA won't take care of is building the attribute from the commit message, and listening to other build commands from comments09:55:46
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßI would have liked to use the outputs of the eval action, but GitHub doesn't return the data I would need09:56:01
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßI'll see what I can do with that, thank you09:56:28
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.org

@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de Sorry to throw a bit of a curve ball, but thank you for doing the ofborg migration anyways :)

09:57:50
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßI mean you basically told me what I should have already known 🤷 never shoot the messenger09:58:24
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßIt's a bit frustrating tbh, but I'll keep going when I have time again (hopefully this year)09:58:59
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.org❤️10:00:04
@infinisil:matrix.org@infinisil:matrix.orgI'll try to communicate things like this more widely in the future10:00:26
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deJanne HeßI don't really see this as your fault, the entire thing of ofborg and equinix was a bit chaotic from my perspective. I see this as something that will likely get better once more steering structures are in place10:01:29

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6