| 29 Dec 2024 |
Janne Heß | ummm 👀 the hosting or the rust code? | 22:03:56 |
raitobezarius | I guess both because the current infra team is not going to invest time to do it I suppose :P ? | 22:04:35 |
raitobezarius | (and I suppose preserving the current state is mostly about reconfiguring ofborg, fixing one or two hardcoding and having the HW actually?) | 22:06:56 |
Janne Heß | The (internal) plan was to do whatever it takes to keep ofborg running and then do pretty much nothing since the start of the year will hit me with larger projects (because december wasn't stressful enough) at work. Around february or march, the projects should be through and I will have time to invest again. My idea was to take on hosting and minor development tasks with Simon Hauser who is more skilled in rust than me doing rust work. We got the green light from management to invest hours into ofborg at work and there are soo many things to do | 22:07:33 |
Janne Heß | For now, it was replacing the PHP code, setting um new infra, moving the evaluator to something that is hostable and sponsored build capacity is currently being spun up | 22:08:31 |
Janne Heß | Current work items (for tomorrow :/) are: getting the builders to run, getting the log infra to run, moving DNS records. That should be it, then (at least until issues arise) | 22:09:54 |
raitobezarius | OK, so there's not much to do with what I'm doing for now | 22:11:14 |
raitobezarius | I'm interested in observability results of that though | 22:11:24 |
Janne Heß | wdym by observability? | 22:11:43 |
raitobezarius | The Prometheus data you will get out of running OfBorg at scale | 22:12:07 |
raitobezarius | Also I guess we should rediscuss once there's actual feature work and technical roadmap to setup | 22:12:19 |
Janne Heß | You imply that I configured any scraping 🤡 | 22:12:23 |
raitobezarius | :D | 22:12:31 |
raitobezarius | I teared out all of the GitHub dependency, etc. So this has consequence on using OfBorg for GitHub again, though should be fixable. | 22:12:44 |
Janne Heß | Sounds very doable, yes. Moving the Github IO more to the "edges" (webhook receiver and comment-poster) would have also been one of my earlier goals | 22:13:41 |
adamcstephens | When I looked at the metrics stuff it seemed like it could use some modernization | 22:21:31 |
Janne Heß | Which part? Eval metrics, stats.php or the rust exporter? | 22:21:57 |
adamcstephens | The exporter? But I’m admittedly not super well versed with rust | 22:24:56 |
adamcstephens | Even some of the metrics exposed didn’t seem to be fully implemented? | 22:25:27 |
Janne Heß | Yeah, it looked a bit … horrible. I just wanted to ignore the fact it exists and take a look later | 22:25:33 |
Janne Heß | Once I saw a build.rs, my motivation of a 100% rewrite was very strong | 22:25:52 |
adamcstephens | There’s the potential for a lot of interesting data, which is what I think Raito was getting at | 22:26:38 |
Janne Heß | Agreed, yes | 22:26:55 |
| 30 Dec 2024 |
Tristan Ross | Janne Heß: I saw https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/369102. Will be be able to get generic rebuild labels per arch and not just per OS? I think Lily Foster was working on that before but I don't think that work was completed. | 04:25:54 |
Janne Heß | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org Janne Heß: I saw https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/369102. Will be be able to get generic rebuild labels per arch and not just per OS? I think Lily Foster was working on that before but I don't think that work was completed. I have no personal preference on this. I mainly wanted to get the feature out of ofborg to get rid of some evals | 09:17:07 |
Janne Heß | Jonas Chevalier: do you have time today for moving the DNS records and add the webhook? | 09:27:20 |
Jonas Chevalier | yes I'm around | 09:42:18 |
Janne Heß | Neat! I think we can do the webhook right now and do the domain migrations later | 09:42:42 |
Janne Heß |  Download image.png | 09:43:30 |
Janne Heß | This is the webhook now (yes it's still "everything" but it's only on repo level now) | 09:43:41 |