| 28 Oct 2024 |
 loudgolem | * But are flaky nixos tests allowed? | 16:54:24 |
| loudgolem | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/348588 | 16:54:49 |
 Tristan Ross | In reply to @phanirithvij:matrix.org
But are flaky nixos tests allowed? It depends on what way you mean by flaky. If it fails because the builder OOM's, that's not flaky. That's just the builder being unreliable. | 16:55:59 |
| loudgolem | got it. I guess I was mistaken about the 129mb limit, thanks | 16:57:34 |
| loudgolem | * got it. I guess I was also mistaken about the 129mb limit, thanks | 16:57:40 |
 @philip4g:matrix.org | Is there any opportunity for me to contribute my Mac hardware (Intel or ARM) for NixOS automated builds? | 22:39:06 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | In what capacity? | 22:54:09 |
| 29 Oct 2024 |
 @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | Possibly for ofborg and no for hydra, I think | 21:45:22 |
| 30 Oct 2024 |
| @philip4g:matrix.org | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
In what capacity? I heard that there is a shortage of Mac hardware in OfBorg, causing auto builds to take a very long time. I have some hardware that OfBorg could use remotely, if such a decentralized solution is feasible. | 18:38:47 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | Is it Apple Silicon? Would you be willing to give over administrative control? (not sure if this is a requirement or not) | 18:50:04 |
| 2 Nov 2024 |
 Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | Ofborg eval seems to be blocked again? (How do we check queue status?) | 15:56:05 |
 hexa | url in th e topic | 16:01:55 |
| hexa | * url in the topic | 16:01:58 |
| Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
url in th e topic The evaluation queue, not build queue | 16:45:58 |
| hexa | the upper graph | 16:46:14 |
| hexa |
ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting
| 16:46:21 |
| Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | Oh I see | 16:50:58 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | 
Download image.png | 17:57:53 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | this doesn't seem sustainable | 17:58:01 |
 Artturin | We need nuclear ofborg | 17:58:23 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | the many hours wait just to get the ofborg eval is starting to become annoying | 21:30:05 |
| Tristan Ross | I've just been running nixpkgs-review on my system but yeah, waiting for Ofborg isn't great. | 21:36:31 |
| 3 Nov 2024 |
 Bot_wxt1221 | Could we move some aarch64-linux builder as evaluator | 09:20:04 |
| hexa | no, we can't magic resources into existance | 15:04:32 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
Could we move some aarch64-linux builder as evaluator I think this has already been talked about. | 15:20:34 |
| Tristan Ross | Looking at the Prometheus graph, we really are lacking that bad with aarch64-darwin? | 15:39:47 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | Have been for a long time | 17:23:27 |
|  Matteo Pacini changed their profile picture. | 21:50:27 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
I think this has already been talked about. So what, we have more aarch64-linux builder that we need. There's no tasks wating for aarch64-linux. Anyway, evaluator is more meaningful than builder. We can run nixpkgs-review locally but without ofborg. It's really slow. It takes about 1 hour on my computer. | 23:48:33 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
So what, we have more aarch64-linux builder that we need. There's no tasks wating for aarch64-linux. Anyway, evaluator is more meaningful than builder. We can run nixpkgs-review locally but without ofborg. It's really slow. It takes about 1 hour on my computer. Idk, using aarch64-linux to eval for aarch64-darwin doesn't feel right lol. Ideally it should evaluate the same but what if it doesn't? | 23:52:29 |
