| 22 Oct 2024 |
 iv-nn | This is my PR that's been waiting for almost 2 months : https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/338842
I need to rebase it but will it be another 2 months? Because then I think I'll just close it. | 23:17:29 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | This is the wrong room | 23:17:52 |
| iv-nn | Is not the right place to ask about ofborg queue? | 23:18:35 |
| iv-nn | * Is it not the right place to ask about ofborg queue? | 23:19:54 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | ofborg is CI, and there are more appropriate rooms for general nixpkgs pull request discussion | 23:20:53 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/MatrixRooms | 23:21:52 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | Review requests would be a good option | 23:22:20 |
| iv-nn | but the PR has been reviewed, it's just the CI that's been stuck on wait. I know aarch64-darwin is over capacity but the run has been waiting for 1 month and 20 days. Is it normal to be this much? | 23:23:53 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | It’s surely not still waiting. | 23:24:14 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | Do the rebase and hopefully it’ll run in the next couple days | 23:24:38 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | It wasn’t clear from your initial message you were talking about a specific build :) | 23:25:11 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | People also wait two months on reviews | 23:25:40 |
| iv-nn | Yeah, sorry. I already asked here and got no response, so I went lazy and did not provide the full context again. | 23:25:55 |
| 27 Oct 2024 |
 K900 | Anyone know why an eval didn't get kicked off in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351498/commits | 09:07:06 |
| K900 | * Anyone know why an eval didn't get kicked off in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351498 | 09:07:08 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Anyone know why an eval didn't get kicked off in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351498/commits (github ate webhook maybe? it's happened sometimes. but someone would probably want to check logs to be sure) | 14:42:39 |
| 28 Oct 2024 |
 loudgolem | do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux) | 15:22:58 |
| loudgolem | * do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram?
virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux) | 15:23:12 |
| loudgolem | I can't seem to add additional swap either without getting swapper/0 invoked oom-killer in a nixos test | 15:25:36 |
| loudgolem | * I can't seem to add additional swap either, getting swapper/0 invoked oom-killer in a nixos test | 15:26:12 |
| loudgolem | * do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? (what free -h reports)
virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux) | 15:27:23 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @phanirithvij:matrix.org
do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux) can you link the PR you're having trouble with? | 16:24:07 |
 Tristan Ross | In reply to @phanirithvij:matrix.org
do aarch64-linux builders have only 129MB ram? (what free -h reports)
virtualisation.memorySize = 256; doesn't work (it does in x86_64-linux) Afaik they have over 64GB | 16:49:30 |
| Tristan Ross | The problem is multiple things using memory, maybe it'll work with a rerun | 16:50:35 |
| loudgolem | But are flaky nixos tests fine? | 16:51:07 |
| loudgolem | I have a pr for swapspace (a dynamic swap space manager which grows/shrinks disk into swap)
And to test it I have to starve the vm to be almost out of memory, but it is occasionally failing the test | 16:53:00 |
| loudgolem | * I have a pr for swapspace (a dynamic swap space manager which grows/shrinks disk into swap)
And to test it I have to starve the vm to be almost out of memory (when swapspace beings to work), but it is occasionally failing the test | 16:53:19 |
| loudgolem | * I have a pr for swapspace (a dynamic swap space manager which grows/shrinks disk into swap)
And to test it I have to starve the vm to be almost out of memory (when swapspace beings to work), but it is occasionally failing the test and getting oomd | 16:53:30 |
| loudgolem | * But are flaky nixos tests allowed? | 16:54:24 |
| loudgolem | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/348588 | 16:54:49 |
