| 26 Jul 2024 |
 7c6f434c | It is notable that all three of the PRs touch packages with an empty or unspecified maintainer list | 14:27:14 |
| 7c6f434c | Maybe there are no rev-deps with non-empty maintainer list? | 14:30:52 |
 Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | In reply to @7c6f434c:nitro.chat
It is notable that all three of the PRs touch packages with an empty or unspecified maintainer list Is this a new feature or always is? | 14:31:59 |
| 7c6f434c | I remember that the first version of implicit packages set traversal for Hydra required specifying platforms and (non-empty) maintainers (years ago)… | 14:34:09 |
| 7c6f434c | Hmmm, not sure if that check ends up used by OfBorg, actually | 14:43:50 |
| 7c6f434c | (Also not sure into which package sets it recurses) | 14:44:18 |
 hexa | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
and core.ofborg.org has no AAAA record set up cole-h: please? | 15:16:23 |
 cole-h | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
cole-h: please? Oops sorry I missed that. Added, should see it when DNS propagation decides to do its thing | 15:32:43 |
| 28 Jul 2024 |
 linj | any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 | 13:32:21 |
| linj | nixpkgs-review gives me 0 rebuilds | 13:32:33 |
