| 28 Feb 2024 |
 Alyssa Ross | it is a bit non-obvious that you don't need to wait for the checks if it has the rebuild-darwin: 0 label, from a UX pov, but it's fiiine | 14:46:04 |
 hexa | yeah, like ofborg sets these labels, and still queues it | 14:46:21 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
i guess the first change that seems reasonable is increasing the staging timeout (or just the darwin timeout in general, it's not like many PRs not to staging would be hitting it either) | 14:46:33 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
(or just the darwin timeout in general, it's not like many PRs not to staging would be hitting it either) (i'm definitely not selfishly asking for this because gst-plugins-rs bumps also timeout on ofborg darwin and don't go to staging 👀) | 14:47:37 |
 7c6f434c | Well if you know in advance they will time out anyway… | 14:48:41 |
| Alyssa Ross | it'd be nice to actually have confirmation from OfBorg you're not about to break something, though | 14:49:37 |
| hexa | kinda what I use the community builder for | 14:49:55 |
| hexa | but that is certainly a hack. | 14:50:18 |
| 2 Mar 2024 |
|  @gabriella439:matrix.org joined the room. | 01:12:22 |
| @gabriella439:matrix.org | ofborg labeled my PR with ofborg-internal-error and seems stuck: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/282401
I'm not sure how I proceed or diagnose this
| 01:13:09 |
 raitobezarius | if you send @ofborg eval again, you can retrigger the eval | 01:13:23 |
| raitobezarius | ofborg can be quite slow yes | 01:13:37 |
| @gabriella439:matrix.org | Do I need to remove the label? | 01:13:43 |
| raitobezarius | I believe ofborg will remove it by itself once it succeed | 01:13:53 |
| @gabriella439:matrix.org | alright, thanks! | 01:14:00 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
I believe ofborg will remove it by itself once it succeed it does not, cole or someone removes it after they check on it in the backend | 01:45:30 |
| Lily Foster | do not remove it manually though (it's just technically not automatic) | 01:45:55 |
|  adamjedrzejewski joined the room. | 14:26:08 |
| 6 Mar 2024 |
 @delroth:delroth.net | links to ofborg on github still sometimes link to nix.ci fyi: e.g. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/291604/checks?check_run_id=22258503849 the "View more details on OfBorg" link at the bottom | 01:53:22 |
| @gabriella439:matrix.org left the room. | 23:57:13 |
| 11 Mar 2024 |
 K900 | Did anyone change anything about the log viewer? | 18:41:12 |
| K900 | It just hard locks my Firefox now | 18:41:20 |
| K900 | I think it might be the Firefox | 18:41:25 |
| K900 | OK updated Firefox and it seems fine now | 18:42:58 |
| K900 | Sorry for the false alarm | 18:43:02 |
| 13 Mar 2024 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/295539/checks?check_run_id=22616537630 | 17:20:18 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | this is confusing. especially since the package does in fact build fine on aarch64-darwin | 17:20:32 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | ahh it's the tests | 17:23:33 |
| 14 Mar 2024 |
|  NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 18:45:07 |
| 15 Mar 2024 |
 [0x4A6F] | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
this is confusing. especially since the package does in fact build fine on aarch64-darwin Yeah, I think something is broken: https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/issues/677
also:
- https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/296054/checks?check_run_id=22718871082
- https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/296054/checks?check_run_id=22690415200
| 19:01:21 |
