| 1 Oct 2023 |
 cole-h | Now the question is: was it also measured in bytes, or do I need to do more math | 15:37:30 |
 hexa | yeah, I would fully expect them to always have used bytes | 15:37:53 |
| cole-h | cool, deploying | 15:38:21 |
| hexa | https://github.com/kubernetes-monitoring/kubernetes-mixin/pull/10 | 15:39:06 |
| hexa | hmmm | 15:39:06 |
| hexa | https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pull/1299 | 15:39:27 |
| hexa | did I misunderstand the metric? | 15:39:50 |
| cole-h | I'm gonna go take a shower, if I come back and someone's told me to change it to avail, I will lol | 15:39:59 |
| hexa | free = available + reserved | 15:40:06 |
| hexa | if we can use reserved space, then go with free, else go with avail | 15:41:19 |
| hexa | does that make sense? | 15:41:24 |
 Lily Foster | Yeah avail seems like the safer side since it's the smaller number and does not include reserved | 15:42:16 |
| Lily Foster | (why do I see conflicting/reverted definitions everywhere even when people are "agreeing" when searching it ðŸ˜) | 15:42:39 |
| cole-h | OK, avail it is | 16:10:42 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | Don’t only certain filesystems even have reserved? eg ext | 17:36:01 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | * Don’t only certain filesystems even have reserved? eg ext3/4 | 17:36:55 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
Don’t only certain filesystems even have reserved? eg ext3/4 Correct | 17:56:56 |
| 3 Oct 2023 |
|  pbsds changed their profile picture. | 21:04:20 |
| 4 Oct 2023 |
 Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/648 | 02:17:29 |
| pbsds changed their profile picture. | 22:20:26 |
| 8 Oct 2023 |
| Artturin | internal errors https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Aofborg-internal-error | 21:23:58 |
| 10 Oct 2023 |
|  cafkafk changed their display name from Christina Sørensen to cafkafk. | 03:39:15 |
| cafkafk changed their profile picture. | 03:39:32 |
| cafkafk | would it be possible to fast track changes that only touch maintainers/maintainer-list.nix? I've got no actual idea how ofborg works, but the checks on that probably aren't super expensive, could be nice if it could get those through faster. | 10:22:22 |
 Alyssa Ross | in general changes that only touch maintainer-list.nix should be pretty rare | 10:23:02 |
| Alyssa Ross | generally if somebody is adding themself to the maintainer list, it should be in the same PR where they are added as the maintainer of a package | 10:23:22 |
| Alyssa Ross | (occasionally, as you've seen, it makes sense to separate it, if somebody new is adding two packages at once or something) | 10:23:37 |
| Alyssa Ross | but OfBorg is like, a couple of hours max | 10:23:43 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @cafkafk:gitter.im
would it be possible to fast track changes that only touch maintainers/maintainer-list.nix? I've got no actual idea how ofborg works, but the checks on that probably aren't super expensive, could be nice if it could get those through faster. What sort of "fast track" are you thinking, like skipping eval checks? | 10:23:51 |
| cafkafk | more like scheduling them first... assuming eval checks don't take super long | 10:24:12 |
