| 16 Dec 2024 |
 Janne Heß | Yaay, but also: oh no 😔. @zimbatm:numtide.com could you? | 17:26:11 |
| 18 Dec 2024 |
 Jonas Chevalier | It looks like the domain is in limbo, I'm not seeing it either | 07:40:33 |
| Jonas Chevalier | Janne Heß: ok, can you give me the new IPs? | 09:10:52 |
| Jonas Chevalier | * Janne Heß: ok (fixed), can you give me the new IPs? | 09:11:16 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @zimbatm:numtide.com
Janne Heß: ok (fixed), can you give me the new IPs? Ah is the zone empty now? 👀 | 09:14:02 |
| Jonas Chevalier | It kept all of the same entires | 09:15:08 |
| Jonas Chevalier | 
Download image.png | 09:15:28 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @zimbatm:numtide.com
It kept all of the same entires Ah whew. If the core01 record is still there, you can just add CNAMEs to it so we only have the IPs in a single place | 09:15:58 |
| Jonas Chevalier | Just to be clear: update the @ ALIAS to point to core1.ofborg.org? | 09:17:24 |
| Jonas Chevalier | And all the other CNAME? | 09:17:42 |
| Janne Heß | No, that's the old infra ;) I'm migrating it service by service to the new infra. core ist old, core01 is new | 09:18:46 |
| Janne Heß | That should allow for migrations with minimal downtime, and only for the website (which isn't that critical) and the logs endpoint | 09:19:31 |
| Jonas Chevalier | * Just to be clear: update the @ ALIAS to point to core01.ofborg.org? | 09:20:46 |
| Jonas Chevalier | Ok, tell me exactly which record you want me to update and I'll do it :) | 09:21:03 |
| Janne Heß | Should only be new records for now:
- gh-webook.ofborg.org. IN CNAME core01.ofborg.org.
- messages.ofborg.org. IN CNAME core01.ofborg.org.
I believe cole used 300 TTL
| 09:30:49 |
| Jonas Chevalier | done | 15:14:32 |
| 20 Dec 2024 |
|  🐰 xiaoxiangmoe joined the room. | 13:59:53 |
| 21 Dec 2024 |
|  @stablejoy:matrix.org left the room. | 05:08:24 |
| @stablejoy:matrix.org joined the room. | 06:43:11 |
|  Dimitar joined the room. | 19:43:48 |
| 22 Dec 2024 |
| Janne Heß | Jonas Chevalier: since you are probably the only person here who can see that - can you send a screenshot (with secret omitted if it's visible) of the webhook config for ofborgß | 12:26:18 |
| Janne Heß | * Jonas Chevalier: since you are probably the only person here who can see that - can you send a screenshot (with secret omitted if it's visible) of the webhook config for ofborg? | 12:26:19 |
| @stablejoy:matrix.org left the room. | 13:25:21 |
| Janne Heß | cole-h: could you take a look at this? https://pad.lassul.us/ofborg-sustainability?view#RabbitMQ-Graph and skim through whether it seems correct. I'm honestly not sure | 13:55:15 |
| Janne Heß | And do you know how/if the lowprior queues are used? | 15:26:05 |
| Janne Heß | * And do you know how/if the lowprior queues are used? There are no exchanges attached | 15:26:25 |
|  allrealmsoflife joined the room. | 15:55:10 |
 Tristan Ross | Has anyone thought about moving Ofborg to parallel evals? I think it's a great concept and looks like it's more efficient. I think it's something worth looking into. Hydra doing the same thing as well would be great. | 17:37:09 |
| Tristan Ross | * Has anyone thought about moving Ofborg to parallel/split evals? I think it's a great concept and looks like it's more efficient. I think it's something worth looking into. Hydra doing the same thing as well would be great. | 17:39:51 |
 ma27 | Hydra is doing that already with hydra-eval-jobs/nix-eva-ljobs. | 17:42:11 |
