| 5 Jan 2024 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | thanks. i would be nice to have a keyword that could just do that for us. e.g. @ofborg rebuild or something | 18:02:47 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | * thanks. it would be nice to have a keyword that could just do that for us. e.g. @ofborg rebuild or something | 18:03:25 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
thanks. i would be nice to have a keyword that could just do that for us. e.g. @ofborg rebuild or something i'll add it the list | 18:03:48 |
| 6 Jan 2024 |
|  Julien joined the room. | 13:57:58 |
| Julien | Ofborg tells me it has no space left on device, is there anything that has to be done by a human or the machine is going to reset at some point automatically ?
https://logs.ofborg.org/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.273062&attempt_id=a8f2a8f3-e050-4610-a6bc-d7443af0f673 | 13:58:41 |
| 7 Jan 2024 |
|  ghpzin joined the room. | 15:33:55 |
| 10 Jan 2024 |
| ghpzin changed their display name from 9hp71n to ghpzin. | 06:33:13 |
|  philipp changed their display name from philipp to test. | 13:48:33 |
| philipp changed their display name from test to philipp. | 13:49:59 |
| 11 Jan 2024 |
 pbsds | ofborg doesn't seem to request reviews from package maintainers, is this a known issue? | 01:06:55 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @pederbs:pvv.ntnu.no
ofborg doesn't seem to request reviews from package maintainers, is this a known issue? link to pr with issue? | 01:20:56 |
| pbsds | I seem to be mistaken | 01:25:35 |
 ElvishJerricco | ofborg failed to build a test for a PR for a very strange reason. Is this something to worry about? https://logs.ofborg.org/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.280296&attempt_id=9716e851-de93-4b2a-a937-9fbf9acc4eb8 | 16:13:47 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
ofborg failed to build a test for a PR for a very strange reason. Is this something to worry about? https://logs.ofborg.org/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.280296&attempt_id=9716e851-de93-4b2a-a937-9fbf9acc4eb8 the no space left bit? | 16:14:28 |
| ElvishJerricco | mainly that, but also the fact that it feels a need to build a kernel for a change like this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/280296/files | 16:15:07 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
mainly that, but also the fact that it feels a need to build a kernel for a change like this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/280296/files it may not be cached on master rn 🤷🏻♀️ | 16:15:50 |
| Lily Foster | it always rebases on master and there's sometimes rebuilds of dependencies on master | 16:16:08 |
| Lily Foster | * it always applies patch against master and there's sometimes rebuilds of dependencies on master | 16:16:19 |
| ElvishJerricco | so I guess I just asked it to build too much at once and it ran out of space in /tmp? | 16:16:29 |
| ElvishJerricco | looks like kernels are not currently cached on master, and it was trying to build two of them at once to run the zfs tests | 16:18:36 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
so I guess I just asked it to build too much at once and it ran out of space in /tmp? well there were kernel releases yesterday and those get merged straight to master, so i can believe that there would be kernel rebuilds on master right now and that ofborg ran out of space trying to build those so it could build the actual test | 16:18:54 |
| ElvishJerricco | I guess I'll build the tests myself then | 16:19:33 |
 ris_ | could ofborg be failing on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274089 because because it's trying to evaluate the packages in (the new) pkgsExtraHardening? | 20:09:55 |
| ris_ | * could ofborg be failing on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274089 because because it's trying to evaluate the packages in (the new) pkgsExtraHardening? | 20:10:12 |
| ris_ | * could ofborg be failing on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274089 because it's trying to evaluate the packages in (the new) pkgsExtraHardening? | 20:10:22 |
 cole-h | I doubt it. The eval failure is because the staging commit your PR is built off of was busted. If you rebase, it should work (or at least get further):
error: evaluation aborted with the following error message: 'lib.customisation.callPackageWith: Function called without required argument "filemagic" at /var/lib/ofborg/checkout/repo/38dca4e3aa6bca43ea96d2fcc04e8229/mr-est/ofborg-evaluator-1/pkgs/development/python-modules/jira/default.nix:5'
| 20:11:28 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @r_i_s:matrix.org
could ofborg be failing on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274089 because because it's trying to evaluate the packages in (the new) pkgsExtraHardening? possibly. on a quick glance on mobile i see the ofborg-eval failure link which shows eval output says this though: Function called without required argument "filemagic"
| 20:11:36 |
| Lily Foster | yeah what cole said (i typed too slow 😅l | 20:11:57 |
| Lily Foster | * yeah what cole said (i typed too slow 😅) | 20:12:00 |
| Lily Foster | In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
I doubt it. The eval failure is because the staging commit your PR is built off of was busted. If you rebase, it should work (or at least get further):
error: evaluation aborted with the following error message: 'lib.customisation.callPackageWith: Function called without required argument "filemagic" at /var/lib/ofborg/checkout/repo/38dca4e3aa6bca43ea96d2fcc04e8229/mr-est/ofborg-evaluator-1/pkgs/development/python-modules/jira/default.nix:5'
i mean it merged onto base branch before doing evals, so staging must have been busted at that anyway? they should just need to retrigger eval rather than rebasing | 20:12:58 |
