| 24 May 2024 |
 Lily Foster | there was a check-meta check to make sure tests was an attrset of derivations | 11:13:50 |
| Lily Foster | but | 11:13:52 |
| Lily Foster | when tests were moved from meta.tests to passthru.tests before that PR was merged | 11:14:14 |
| Lily Foster | the check-meta check was not updated | 11:14:20 |
| Lily Foster | so it's not useful right now | 11:14:27 |
| Lily Foster | but checking it there-ish would be ideal | 11:14:49 |
| Lily Foster | (and then abort-ish eval failures (e.g. syntax errors) vs throw-ish eval failures would also be differentiated, as intended by most eval checks) | 11:15:52 |
| Lily Foster | * (and then abort-ish eval failures (e.g. syntax errors) vs throw-ish eval failures (e.g. not available on platform) would also be differentiated, as intended by most eval checks) | 11:16:18 |
| 27 May 2024 |
 vcunat | Any idea if the eval label mechanism is broken? It got completely wrong in this case: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314255#issuecomment-2132781439 | 07:06:12 |
| vcunat | (also in the original PR from which this backport was created) | 07:07:28 |
| vcunat | Or do the linux rebuild labels not take aarch64-linux into account? | 07:07:58 |
 hexa | vcunat: https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/blob/1d74f577a10ca1adbc933bdfb966d380aa343eb1/ofborg/src/tagger.rs#L327 🙂 | 12:47:59 |
| hexa | aarch64 is not represented in there | 12:48:53 |
| hexa | * aarch64 is not represented in there, not for linux, not for darwin | 12:49:06 |
| vcunat | Maybe we could do an average over the pair of platforms? | 12:49:21 |
| hexa | or create two more sets of labels 🤷 | 12:49:44 |
| vcunat | For darwin we even build them on the same set of machines. | 12:50:44 |
