!tCyGickeVqkHsYjWnh:nixos.org

NixOS Networking

865 Members
Declaratively manage your switching, routing, wireless, tunneling and more. | Don't rely on `networking.*` use systemd-networkd and NetworkManager instead. | Set `SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug` to debug networking issues with networkd | No bad nft puns, please. | Room recommendations: #sysops:nixos.org248 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
3 Oct 2025
@elisaado:matrix.orgelisaado joined the room.19:28:02
@elisaado:matrix.orgelisaadoHi :)19:28:29
@elisaado:matrix.orgelisaadoI'm a VyOS user but with the current state of VyOS and the fact that I run NixOS with asahi on my mac, I've been thinking about building a virtual router using NixOS19:29:07
@moleksiak:matrix.orgmoleksiak joined the room.23:13:43
4 Oct 2025
@marcel:envs.netMarcel All software you are using under the hood on vyos should be available on nixos. Only the experience is probably not going to feel the same level of uniform. 03:03:47
@k900:0upti.meK900 FWIW I've been running NixOS on my home router (bpi-r4) for a while now, and pretty happy with it 06:07:48
@k900:0upti.meK900 Running networkd + kea/unbound + a bunch of custom jank 06:08:12
@aleksana:mozilla.orgaleksana 🏳️‍⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC)
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
FWIW I've been running NixOS on my home router (bpi-r4) for a while now, and pretty happy with it
I'd also like to buy this device. Did you encounter any problems?
06:25:04
@k900:0upti.meK900You need kernel patches to get the 10G ports to work06:25:47
@aleksana:mozilla.orgaleksana 🏳️‍⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC)
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
You need kernel patches to get the 10G ports to work
Like this issue? https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/17207
06:27:01
@k900:0upti.meK900Like this tree06:27:58
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/K900/linux/tree/bpi-r4-test06:27:59
@flokli:matrix.orgflokli @k900:0upti.me: how's the upstreaming of all the kernel fixes going? ;-) 06:28:06
* @k900:0upti.meK900 gestures vaguely at the burning dumpster06:28:25
@k900:0upti.meK900Also the official BE14 wireless daughterboard is not great for signal integrity06:29:25
@flokli:matrix.orgflokli1000069186.jpg
Download 1000069186.jpg
06:29:34
@k900:0upti.meK900 It's very usable, but it's not amazing 06:29:34
@k900:0upti.meK900The upcoming BE19 should be significantly better06:29:52
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliYeah, but half of the fixes are bringup of the main board, and only a few bits the wifi card connected via pcie, no?06:30:47
@aleksana:mozilla.orgaleksana 🏳️‍⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC)
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
https://github.com/K900/linux/tree/bpi-r4-test
Okay thanks
06:31:02
@k900:0upti.meK900That's continuing my previous train of thought06:31:02
@k900:0upti.meK900The wireless actually works just fine on mainline06:31:09
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliAka, getting most of the fixes massaged upwards is still worthwhile 06:31:04
@k900:0upti.meK900At this point the only things 6.17 is missing is the Ethernet06:31:21
@k900:0upti.meK900 It's not that it's not worthwhile 06:31:34
@k900:0upti.meK900It's that no one has found the time, so far06:31:43
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliSo no more custom hacks needed for fixed regulator stuff to get it not to oops?06:31:47
@k900:0upti.meK900The regulator stuff is not a hack06:31:54
@k900:0upti.meK900I've verified with the schematics06:32:07
@flokli:matrix.orgflokliOk, but then the device tree is incomplete?06:32:44

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6