| 29 Jun 2025 |
 hexa | probably because the proponents have been alienated by all the discussions we had | 03:37:44 |
 ElvishJerricco | We should just double check that we have assertions for any unsupported options and then flip it on ASAP | 03:38:24 |
| hexa | 
Download image.png | 03:39:12 |
| hexa | am I missing anything? | 03:39:14 |
| hexa | that looks like and awkward interface to set up static addressing | 03:39:29 |
| hexa | oh god, it can create tun/tap interfaces | 03:39:53 |
| ElvishJerricco | image doesn't want to load over here | 03:40:21 |
| hexa | https://search.nixos.org/options?channel=25.05&show=networking.interfaces.%3Cname%3E.proxyARP&from=0&size=50&sort=relevance&type=packages&query=networking.interfaces | 03:40:28 |
| ElvishJerricco | hm? | 03:41:45 |
| hexa | that is the screenshot | 03:42:19 |
| hexa | ipv4/ipv6 addressing and routes should be covered | 03:42:30 |
| ElvishJerricco | Maybe this is my networking knowledge being bad but I don't understand what proxyARP has to do with that | 03:43:58 |
| hexa | mtu is covered
mac is covered | 03:44:04 |
| hexa | proxyARP is not covered | 03:44:35 |
| ElvishJerricco | Oh. I mean networkd has options for proxyARP | 03:44:50 |
| ElvishJerricco | can we not just wire that up? | 03:45:02 |
| hexa | but it's not mapped afaiict | 03:45:04 |
| hexa | * but it's not mapped afaict | 03:45:06 |
| hexa |
networkd: ProxyARP= vs. ARPProxy= confusion #4768
| 03:45:21 |
| hexa | lol | 03:45:22 |
| hexa | https://search.nixos.org/options?channel=25.05&show=networking.interfaces.%3Cname%3E.ipv4.routes.*.options&from=0&size=50&sort=relevance&type=packages&query=networking.interfaces | 03:47:09 |
| hexa | ouch | 03:47:09 |
| hexa |
See the symbol OPTIONS in the ip-route(8) manual page for the details
| 03:47:22 |
