| 30 Jul 2025 |
 hexa | the discussion is about bringing parity for network configuration options between the running system and the initrd, no need to question everything from first principles | 19:41:08 |
 DenKn | yes, than you have only one network config | 19:48:42 |
 emily | this is initrd except worse | 19:50:09 |
| emily | since you can easily verify initrd with secure boot/attestation | 19:50:18 |
| hexa | or at least the one you are already familiar with | 19:51:38 |
| hexa | * or at least the configuration stack one you are already familiar with | 19:51:47 |
| DenKn | There are a filesystem/dm-module with no encryption, but with signing? | 20:12:57 |
 K900 | There are options, yes | 20:14:35 |
| emily | (with complicated trade-offs) | 20:16:13 |
| emily | (and not ones that are easy to deploy mutable NixOS systems to) | 20:16:19 |
| DenKn | I do not need encryption, but signing would be interesting in such cases. I only want to mount encrypted data, but mostly the system could be only signed | 20:18:30 |
| emily | dm-verity is used for this in production | 20:20:33 |
| emily | but is only really suitable for image deploys | 20:20:37 |
| emily | fs-verity has potential for mutable systems but is complicated to close the gap with | 20:20:47 |
 ElvishJerricco | huh, I can't seem to get networking to work with libvirt anymore... | 23:58:18 |
| 31 Jul 2025 |
| ElvishJerricco | If I set up a VM with virt-manager and just let it do its default network, which should be some NAT thing, it seems like it's just not doing DHCP | 00:15:10 |
| ElvishJerricco | great... If I downgrade virtualisation.libvirtd.package to the libvirt from 25.05 it works... | 00:34:16 |
| hexa | https://media.freifunk.net/v/openwrt-on-realtek-switches | 20:44:11 |
