| 3 Jul 2025 |
 K900 | Then yeah something like that | 10:12:52 |
 @emma:rory.gay | alright, thanks <3 | 10:13:03 |
| @emma:rory.gay | mount: /mnt: fsconfig() failed: NFS: mount program didn't pass remote address., not sure what im doing wrong | 10:21:51 |
| @emma:rory.gay | here's the command im trying: sudo mount full-server-dns-name:/exported/path /mnt | 10:22:27 |
| @emma:rory.gay | using mount.nfs4 however just seems to hang | 10:30:26 |
| K900 | Firewall? | 10:31:02 |
| @emma:rory.gay | already forwarded the port on the server end | 10:31:14 |
| @emma:rory.gay | at least assuming i didnt fail horribly at reading the docs... TCP/2049 | 10:31:46 |
| @emma:rory.gay | oh, didnt start the nfs4-server service... i completely missed that given you need to run a separate command to update the exports list | 10:33:00 |
| @emma:rory.gay | argh, kernel compile time, turns out the server's kernel doesnt have nsfd | 10:33:58 |
| K900 | Maybe also try ksmbd | 10:34:33 |
| K900 | If you have that | 10:34:38 |
| @emma:rory.gay | oh it needs a reboot... lol | 10:34:50 |
| @emma:rory.gay | ... assuming i didnt brick the system, at least | 10:35:44 |
| @emma:rory.gay | cool, it lives, except the database | 10:37:04 |
| @emma:rory.gay | okay, unless i did something wrong, nfs4 seems to end up slower than sshfs? | 10:44:51 |
 @saiko:knifepoint.net | afaik that is to be expected, it does a lot more stuff like locking and whatnot | 10:47:02 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | every serious network file system that tries to avoid file corruption is going to be slower than sshfs | 10:47:27 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | if you’re getting abysmal performance though, make sure it’s not mounted with the sync option though | 10:48:50 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | * if you’re getting abysmal performance though, make sure it’s not mounted with the sync option | 10:48:55 |
| K900 | You might also need to enable nfs4.2? | 10:49:27 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | I think that should be default? | 10:50:37 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | my exports just has /Volumes/storage -rw,sync,no_subtree_check,sec=krb5:krb5i:krb5p,insecure * | 10:50:50 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | and the client uses whatever the best is | 10:51:23 |
| @emma:rory.gay | 4.2 feels the same | 10:51:59 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | I think it shows the version in the mount command output | 10:52:22 |
| @emma:rory.gay | its not sync, though im trying to avoid extra lookups given that, well... >100ms latency between client and version | 10:52:31 |
| @emma:rory.gay | * its not sync, though im trying to avoid extra lookups given that, well... >100ms latency between client and serve | 10:52:34 |
| @emma:rory.gay | * its not sync, though im trying to avoid extra lookups given that, well... >100ms latency between client and server | 10:52:35 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net | ah, are you mounting it over the internet? | 10:53:59 |
