NixOS Networking | 916 Members | |
| Declaratively manage your switching, routing, wireless, tunneling and more. | 267 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Dec 2025 | ||
| * At the moment, I have a very simple firewall rule for my router to ensure traffic between private and guest networks don't ever interfere. The configuration for that is here. Additionally, I have a helper function of sorts to create wireguard interfaces. Given I'm very new to firewall rules and routing, I'm not sure how to ensure that all traffic from the private network is routed via the wireguard interface but the guest network's traffic exits without ever touching the wireguard interface. Let's call it I believe that this setup will require the following additional rules to the
And also require a new
This is what I have come up with so far. Is there anything else that I'm missing, or doing wrong? (edit: switched git reference from master to a specific commit) | 09:02:49 | |
| * At the moment, I have a very simple firewall rule for my router to ensure traffic between private and guest networks don't ever interfere. The configuration for that is here. Additionally, I have a helper function of sorts to create wireguard interfaces. Given I'm very new to firewall rules and routing, I'm not sure how to ensure that all traffic from the private network is routed via the wireguard interface but the guest network's traffic exits without ever touching the wireguard interface. Let's call it I believe that this setup will require the following additional rules to the
And also require a new
This is what I have come up with so far. Is there anything else that I'm missing, or doing wrong? (edit: switched git reference from master to a specific commit) | 09:04:06 | |
| 12:41:07 | ||
does systemd-resolved support secret configs? judging by man resolved.conf, it only accepts entries from systemd/resolved.conf[.d/*.conf] | 16:46:31 | |
| You might be able to use agenix | 16:52:57 | |
| i already use sops-nix, how would it be different? | 16:54:13 | |
| It shouldn't be that different | 16:56:29 | |
| but does resolved support configs from outside /etc/systemd? | 16:56:52 | |
| I don't know. But if your trying to specify a secrets file in a unit you can use extraConfig | 16:59:05 | |
| Sops also supports installing secrets so any location. Not just /run/secrets | 16:59:36 | |
| ah, TIL | 17:00:36 | |
| * | 17:18:50 | |
| on a semi-related note, I want to use NextDNS without its client, which option of the listed ones (Resolved, Dnsmasq, Stubby, DNScrypt, Kresd, Cloudflared, Unbound) is the most convenient/fitting for a laptop-only setup? | 17:27:17 | |
| * on a semi-related note, I want to use NextDNS without its client, which option of the listed ones (Resolved, Dnsmasq, Stubby, DNScrypt, Kresd, Cloudflared, Unbound) is the most convenient/fitting for a laptop-only setup, with ot without considering NixOS? | 17:28:44 | |
| resolved is definitely the least work | 17:33:35 | |
| and already integrates with NetworkManager | 17:34:25 | |
| (but so does Dnsmasq 🤔 ) | 17:34:40 | |
| ight, the resolved config works well, only one moment: why are some queries detected both from my laptop (DNS-over-TLS + custom ID) and from my router (plain IP)? | 20:34:50 | |
| 25 Dec 2025 | ||
| And integrates well with split vpns like tailscale | 09:09:04 | |
| 19 May 2021 | ||
| 19:20:58 | ||
| 19:20:58 | ||
| 19:21:08 | ||
| 19:21:17 | ||
| 19:23:16 | ||
| 19:26:50 | ||
| 19:27:05 | ||
| 19:40:47 | ||
| 19:42:15 | ||
| 19:50:53 | ||
| 20:03:52 | ||