!tCyGickeVqkHsYjWnh:nixos.org

NixOS Networking

905 Members
Declaratively manage your switching, routing, wireless, tunneling and more.263 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
13 Jun 2025
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.com emily: do you have a functional hostapd config? 17:16:09
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.comim banging my head against this for way too long17:16:12
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyno, haven't even started on WiFi yet17:17:18
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.com😭17:17:37
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily (I also don't fully understand whether I should be configuring end0 at all in any way) 17:22:58
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.com DFS start_dfs_cac() failed, -1 17:26:50
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.comi cant get this working, no matter what channel i set it complains about "hardware doesnt support channel"17:41:50
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.comalso all my 5ghz channels are no IR?17:42:08
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.comi love it when broken firmware makes it into linux git ffs, rolled back to whatever i have in nixos unstable and it magically works17:47:58
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.com😮‍💨17:48:05
@k900:0upti.meK900 No you shouldn't 17:57:10
@k900:0upti.meK900 Wrong regdomain? Or missing regdb 17:57:22
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily🫡18:15:35
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhow does the fast path between the SFP+ LAN port and the twisted pair LAN ports work?18:16:28
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit seems like the twisted pair ports are on their own switch and the SFP+s are just independent18:16:39
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.comfucked firmware more lik18:17:03
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.com* fucked firmware more like18:17:05
@k900:0upti.meK900 I still don't quite get that 18:17:38
@k900:0upti.meK900I have not looked at the leaked docs18:17:42
@k900:0upti.meK900They should be connected to the same NETSYSv3 block18:17:57
@k900:0upti.meK900But what that means exactly, I don't know18:18:02
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydo I have to do something special to make it work?18:18:24
@k900:0upti.meK900You probably just want a hardware flowtable18:18:55
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyugh :P18:19:18
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI'll need to figure out all this offload stuff soon I guess18:19:22
@magic_rb:numtide.com@magic_rb:numtide.comhaving internet is nice18:32:37
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyuhhh. I think my ISP might have gotten sick of how many times I've connected recently and started dropping my PPP connections19:20:45
14 Jun 2025
@donjoe:nanashi0x74.dev@donjoe:nanashi0x74.dev left the room.09:20:47
15 Jun 2025
@luke:vuksta.comLuke Hey folks, sorry if this is not the right room (I can ask elsewhere if this is not the correct place for questions about nginx); I recently made some updates to the Fluidd and Moonraker services to allow serving these at a path here. I've tested this on my setup, using a single path /printer/ for the new baseUrl and routePrefix options, but I am not sure the nginx declarations are correct. If someone who is an nginx expert could give it a once over I'd appreciate it. In particular, I don't know if any of the proxyPass parts are robust enough to merge yet, or if they would even work if Moonraker and Fluidd have different paths? Though it seems those services may be intended to be served at the same path? 02:55:05
@k900:0upti.meK900Looks reasonable enough, but also, why?09:24:44

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6