| 13 Jun 2025 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | emily: do you have a functional hostapd config? | 17:16:09 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | im banging my head against this for way too long | 17:16:12 |
emily | no, haven't even started on WiFi yet | 17:17:18 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | 😭 | 17:17:37 |
emily | (I also don't fully understand whether I should be configuring end0 at all in any way) | 17:22:58 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | DFS start_dfs_cac() failed, -1 | 17:26:50 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | i cant get this working, no matter what channel i set it complains about "hardware doesnt support channel" | 17:41:50 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | also all my 5ghz channels are no IR? | 17:42:08 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | i love it when broken firmware makes it into linux git ffs, rolled back to whatever i have in nixos unstable and it magically works | 17:47:58 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | 😮💨 | 17:48:05 |
K900 | No you shouldn't | 17:57:10 |
K900 | Wrong regdomain? Or missing regdb | 17:57:22 |
emily | 🫡 | 18:15:35 |
emily | how does the fast path between the SFP+ LAN port and the twisted pair LAN ports work? | 18:16:28 |
emily | it seems like the twisted pair ports are on their own switch and the SFP+s are just independent | 18:16:39 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | fucked firmware more lik | 18:17:03 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | * fucked firmware more like | 18:17:05 |
K900 | I still don't quite get that | 18:17:38 |
K900 | I have not looked at the leaked docs | 18:17:42 |
K900 | They should be connected to the same NETSYSv3 block | 18:17:57 |
K900 | But what that means exactly, I don't know | 18:18:02 |
emily | do I have to do something special to make it work? | 18:18:24 |
K900 | You probably just want a hardware flowtable | 18:18:55 |
emily | ugh :P | 18:19:18 |
emily | I'll need to figure out all this offload stuff soon I guess | 18:19:22 |
@magic_rb:numtide.com | having internet is nice | 18:32:37 |
emily | uhhh. I think my ISP might have gotten sick of how many times I've connected recently and started dropping my PPP connections | 19:20:45 |
| 14 Jun 2025 |
| @donjoe:nanashi0x74.dev left the room. | 09:20:47 |
| 15 Jun 2025 |
Luke | Hey folks, sorry if this is not the right room (I can ask elsewhere if this is not the correct place for questions about nginx); I recently made some updates to the Fluidd and Moonraker services to allow serving these at a path here. I've tested this on my setup, using a single path /printer/ for the new baseUrl and routePrefix options, but I am not sure the nginx declarations are correct. If someone who is an nginx expert could give it a once over I'd appreciate it. In particular, I don't know if any of the proxyPass parts are robust enough to merge yet, or if they would even work if Moonraker and Fluidd have different paths? Though it seems those services may be intended to be served at the same path? | 02:55:05 |
K900 | Looks reasonable enough, but also, why? | 09:24:44 |