!tCyGickeVqkHsYjWnh:nixos.org

NixOS Networking

857 Members
Declaratively manage your switching, routing, wireless, tunneling and more. | Don't rely on `networking.*` use systemd-networkd and NetworkManager instead. | Set `SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug` to debug networking issues with networkd | No bad nft puns, please. | Room recommendations: #sysops:nixos.org245 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 Jul 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythis is initrd except worse19:50:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysince you can easily verify initrd with secure boot/attestation19:50:18
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)or at least the one you are already familiar with19:51:38
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)* or at least the configuration stack one you are already familiar with19:51:47
@denkn:denkn.at𝔇𝔢𝔫𝔎𝔫There are a filesystem/dm-module with no encryption, but with signing?20:12:57
@k900:0upti.meK900There are options, yes20:14:35
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(with complicated trade-offs)20:16:13
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(and not ones that are easy to deploy mutable NixOS systems to)20:16:19
@denkn:denkn.at𝔇𝔢𝔫𝔎𝔫I do not need encryption, but signing would be interesting in such cases. I only want to mount encrypted data, but mostly the system could be only signed20:18:30
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydm-verity is used for this in production20:20:33
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilybut is only really suitable for image deploys20:20:37
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyfs-verity has potential for mutable systems but is complicated to close the gap with20:20:47
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohuh, I can't seem to get networking to work with libvirt anymore...23:58:18
31 Jul 2025
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoIf I set up a VM with virt-manager and just let it do its default network, which should be some NAT thing, it seems like it's just not doing DHCP00:15:10
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco great... If I downgrade virtualisation.libvirtd.package to the libvirt from 25.05 it works... 00:34:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)https://media.freifunk.net/v/openwrt-on-realtek-switches20:44:11
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensI run a couple gigabit realtek switches on openwrt. They've been stable and without problems 20:52:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)how fun is management?20:55:59
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensI'm not changing it much. Mostly just updates, which have been problem free. The interfaces for the basic switch setup are mildly awkward, either GUI or config, but they're passable20:57:04
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensIt would be nice to get one with 8x10GB SFP ports and maybe 24x2.5G, to replace my core switch, but I haven't seen one that meets that. And I really don't have any 2.5G yet, so no rush.20:58:55
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensThe two I currently have are 1G edge switches. a NETGEAR GS308T v1 and a HPE 1920-8G (JG920A)21:01:30
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily8x 10 Gbit/s with OpenWrt support is a thing22:58:19
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilya couple such Realtek models have been discussed in here22:58:30
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)2x10G, 12-16 Ports, some 2.5G ports, PoE, no fan, not full size23:00:30
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)thx23:00:31
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)* 2x10G, 12-16 Ports, some 2.5G ports, some PoE, no fan, not full size23:00:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)* 2x10G, 12-16 Ports, some 2.5G ports, some PoE, no fan, ideally not full size23:01:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (clat on linux when)also the fact that the realtek target still seems to be on 5.15 is worrying23:03:48
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythere is at least one guy working on upstreaming support for the Realtek stuff23:06:58
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilybut it's not there I think23:07:03

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6