!vxTmkuJzhGPsMdkAOc:transformierende-gesellschaft.org

NixOS Matrix Subsystem

119 Members
Coordination and discussion about the matrix subsystem in NixOS - https://nixos.wiki/wiki/Matrix66 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 Sep 2022
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)but there was at least one other one17:20:20
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsthat explains why nobody's looked at it yet ;p17:20:24
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)lol17:20:31
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsoh right i never pr'd it because i had to use a non-release rev17:21:10
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsmaybe i should poke them to make a release17:22:02
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
oh right i never pr'd it because i had to use a non-release rev
why did you need to use it?
17:23:02
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)(and do we have it packaged right now as a release version)17:23:11
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)(no, we don't have it packaged right now)17:25:02
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsthere's some changes i needed since the last release17:29:53
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)Running tests on Dendrite bump. Any volunteers to test out the full-text search to make sure everything is OK?20:46:46
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/19376720:52:42
1 Oct 2022
@kity:kity.wtfproblems @Winter (she/her) i haven't tested your pr but i updated on my own yesterday and full text search works 19:50:42
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
@Winter (she/her) i haven't tested your pr but i updated on my own yesterday and full text search works
would you happen to mind testing my PR when you get a chance to make sure it works the same? (it should, but sanity checks are always good :)
20:04:38
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)*works all the same20:04:44
7 Oct 2022
@kity:kity.wtfproblemshas anyone tried packaging the sliding sync proxy yet? (https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync)21:06:23
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsseems like they're aiming to deploy that for matrix.org instead of implementing it in synapse, at least at first21:08:46
13 Oct 2022
@philipp:xndr.dephilipphttps://www.process-one.net/blog/matrix-protocol-added-to-ejabberd/12:53:31
14 Oct 2022
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng Li
In reply to @philipp:xndr.de
https://www.process-one.net/blog/matrix-protocol-added-to-ejabberd/
Looks interesting, but the positioning of Matrix as for "small corporate servers" is kind of odd
01:55:21
@ralith:ralith.comRaliththat is super weird04:47:15
@ralith:ralith.comRalithtrying to downplay it to protect their relevance?04:47:28
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsit's super weird for someone to "just" add matrix server capabilities to a software12:54:55
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsor even a team12:55:30
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsi've watched progress on dendrite and conduit and it's not that easy12:55:48
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsand for them to claim it's gonna be more scalable than existing matrix servers right off the bat, that's pretty bold12:56:46
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsconduit has the boon of ruma already existing and it's still nowhere near ready for production12:57:36
@philipp:xndr.dephilippYeah, those are a couple of very bold claims.13:04:50
@philipp:xndr.dephilippAnd when I remember how ejabberd actually was to run back when I did it, those claims seem to be even bolder.13:05:49
@kity:kity.wtfproblemssince it doesn't say anything about supporting matrix clients i wonder if it just doesn't support e2ee or anything, and only does the bare minimum to bridge xmpp14:10:29
@kity:kity.wtfproblemsthat might be more reasonable14:10:40
15 Oct 2022
@tinybronca:sibnsk.netunderpantsgnome changed their display name from underpantsgnome to underpantsgnome!.00:35:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 4