NixOS Matrix Subsystem | 150 Members | |
| Coordination and discussion about the matrix subsystem in NixOS - https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/Matrix | 74 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sep 2023 | ||
| * as the worker setup is very brittle, we should probably try to co-maintain most of the code | 18:12:12 | |
| * as the worker setup is very brittle, we should probably try to co-maintain most of the code required for a productive worker setup | 18:12:43 | |
| and not let everyone come up with a weird downstream solution | 18:12:50 | |
| * and not let everyone come up with an even weirder downstream solution | 18:13:07 | |
In reply to @hexa:lossy.networkha ha sweats | 18:14:42 | |
| I was not looking at you, I swear! | 18:15:02 | |
| I think maintaining the map and making opinionated types of workers is something that should be in nixpkgs. I'm not sure what you are arguing for | 18:16:31 | |
In reply to @dandellion:dodsorf.as so, in case of an rfc42 compliant nginx module I'd be all in favor. ANd now back to reality ;-) I'm somewhat afraid that we'll come up with something that will be incomplete and if you need to change something, you'll need to touch the module rather quickly or need something else (which is an actual problem with the nextcloud module). However, two things: first of all, after having played around with my synapse and messed up a few things while doing that (e.g. read receipts being broken because of an nginx misconfiguration) I think that mweinelt has a point here. Also, it's a purely opt-in thing, so it might not be that bad after all. That said, is the current module on your github in a reviewable state? | 19:12:23 | |
| yeah, workers did in fact introduce subtle breakages for me as well, like crypto intermittently stopped working 😄 | 19:53:16 | |
| traced that back to the stream writers, and disabled all but events as well | 19:53:37 | |
| nextcloud is arguably worse with how large the nginx config actually is, and that you need priorities for location blocks | 19:54:49 | |
| 21 Sep 2023 | ||
| 23:08:51 | ||
| 22 Sep 2023 | ||
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVl-jw_O_MQ | 12:00:45 | |
| 20:13:08 | |
*
| 20:13:27 | |
| workers didn't start up after reboot | 20:13:37 | |
In reply to @hexa:lossy.networkseems as if they were marked as broken as a result of something they depend on. any chance you can find out what that is? | 20:15:41 | |
| 20:16:29 | |
| failure set talk to my OIDC provider L/ | 20:18:44 | |
| * failure set talk to my OIDC provider | 20:18:45 | |