| 20 Nov 2024 |
|  inayet removed their profile picture. | 00:59:37 |
| 24 Nov 2024 |
|  Frédéric Christ joined the room. | 20:16:34 |
| 27 Nov 2024 |
|  jopejoe1 (4094@GPN23) changed their display name from jopejoe1 to jopejoe1 [4094]. | 18:18:41 |
| 3 Dec 2024 |
 Sumner Evans | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/361495 | 17:26:25 |
| Sumner Evans | Redacted or Malformed Event | 17:26:30 |
| Sumner Evans | Redacted or Malformed Event | 17:26:38 |
| 16 Dec 2024 |
|  michal_atlas joined the room. | 03:09:50 |
| 26 Dec 2024 |
| Frédéric Christ changed their display name from Frédéric Christ to Frédéric Christ (DECT 5915). | 18:29:41 |
| 27 Dec 2024 |
|  pinpox changed their display name from pinpox to pinpox [DECT: 7170]. | 15:22:48 |
| 1 Jan 2025 |
| pinpox changed their display name from pinpox [DECT: 7170] to pinpox. | 18:20:04 |
| jopejoe1 (4094@GPN23) changed their display name from jopejoe1 [4094] to jopejoe1. | 23:29:19 |
| 9 Jan 2025 |
 Maximilian Güntner | Has anyone tried Element Call / livekit / whatever is needed for MSC3401 yet? | 23:28:25 |
| 10 Jan 2025 |
 fpletz | synapse is broken again :/ https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/371815 | 19:30:05 |
| 11 Jan 2025 |
 hexa |
nix-repl> matrix-synapse.meta.maintainers
[
{ ... }
{ ... }
{ ... }
{ ... }
{ ... }
{ ... }
{ ... }
{ ... }
]
| 01:53:46 |
| hexa | verantwortungsdiffusion 101 | 01:54:34 |
| hexa | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_responsibility | 01:54:42 |
 ma27 | I disagree: I would've taken a look, but first Ibwas on vacation and now in bed with fever🫠 | 06:38:57 |
| ma27 | that being said, I'll update my github status next time I'm gone. Or does anybody have a better suggestion to communicate that? | 07:20:33 |
| Sumner Evans | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_responsibility https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/371815#issuecomment-2578721396 I was concerned about this and didn't feel comfortable making a call to ignore it. | 07:43:56 |
| hexa | So, half the maintainers list last touched the package before more than 3y ago | 17:48:36 |
| hexa | * So, half the maintainers list last touched the package more than 3y ago | 17:52:37 |
| ma27 | I think part of the problem is that the maintainer team thingy is used for far too broad scopes: like, I'm also a dendrite maintainer because of the membership, but I haven't touched this package a single time. Same goes for a bunch of bridges.
This is a thing I observed in a few more teams and I"m not sure anymore if I consider them as reasonable as a while ago. | 18:04:44 |
| Sumner Evans | same, I think we should make the membership per-package | 18:14:13 |
 emily | I think things would be a lot better if we removed inactive maintainers as standard procedure | 18:35:25 |
| emily | and then implemented the RFC to delete packages that stay unmaintained for long enough | 18:35:37 |
| emily | (though for teams that would again mean there's packages nobody cares about but stick around because they have team overlap) | 18:40:07 |
| emily | I think teams make sense for things like platform support or ACME. maybe not so much for "anything to do with Matrix" | 18:40:28 |
|  majes1ic joined the room. | 19:44:20 |
| 12 Jan 2025 |
|  @strutztm:strutztm.de joined the room. | 00:24:21 |
|  py6m0e7i joined the room. | 19:43:48 |
