| 30 Sep 2022 |
 Winter (she/her) | yeah i fixed one of them | 17:19:59 |
| Winter (she/her) | ~~(with the help of someone else)~~ | 17:20:10 |
 problems | oh huh did i not actually make a pr for my matrix-media-repo module? i thought i did... | 17:20:17 |
| Winter (she/her) | but there was at least one other one | 17:20:20 |
| problems | that explains why nobody's looked at it yet ;p | 17:20:24 |
| Winter (she/her) | lol | 17:20:31 |
| problems | oh right i never pr'd it because i had to use a non-release rev | 17:21:10 |
| problems | maybe i should poke them to make a release | 17:22:02 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
oh right i never pr'd it because i had to use a non-release rev why did you need to use it? | 17:23:02 |
| Winter (she/her) | (and do we have it packaged right now as a release version) | 17:23:11 |
| Winter (she/her) | (no, we don't have it packaged right now) | 17:25:02 |
| problems | there's some changes i needed since the last release | 17:29:53 |
| Winter (she/her) | Running tests on Dendrite bump. Any volunteers to test out the full-text search to make sure everything is OK? | 20:46:46 |
| Winter (she/her) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/193767 | 20:52:42 |
| 1 Oct 2022 |
| problems | @Winter (she/her) i haven't tested your pr but i updated on my own yesterday and full text search works | 19:50:42 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
@Winter (she/her) i haven't tested your pr but i updated on my own yesterday and full text search works would you happen to mind testing my PR when you get a chance to make sure it works the same? (it should, but sanity checks are always good :) | 20:04:38 |
| Winter (she/her) | *works all the same | 20:04:44 |
| 7 Oct 2022 |
| problems | has anyone tried packaging the sliding sync proxy yet? (https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync) | 21:06:23 |
| problems | seems like they're aiming to deploy that for matrix.org instead of implementing it in synapse, at least at first | 21:08:46 |
| 13 Oct 2022 |
 philipp | https://www.process-one.net/blog/matrix-protocol-added-to-ejabberd/ | 12:53:31 |
| 14 Oct 2022 |
 Zhaofeng Li | In reply to @philipp:xndr.de
https://www.process-one.net/blog/matrix-protocol-added-to-ejabberd/ Looks interesting, but the positioning of Matrix as for "small corporate servers" is kind of odd | 01:55:21 |
 Ralith | that is super weird | 04:47:15 |
| Ralith | trying to downplay it to protect their relevance? | 04:47:28 |
| problems | it's super weird for someone to "just" add matrix server capabilities to a software | 12:54:55 |
| problems | or even a team | 12:55:30 |
| problems | i've watched progress on dendrite and conduit and it's not that easy | 12:55:48 |
| problems | and for them to claim it's gonna be more scalable than existing matrix servers right off the bat, that's pretty bold | 12:56:46 |
| problems | conduit has the boon of ruma already existing and it's still nowhere near ready for production | 12:57:36 |
| philipp | Yeah, those are a couple of very bold claims. | 13:04:50 |
| philipp | And when I remember how ejabberd actually was to run back when I did it, those claims seem to be even bolder. | 13:05:49 |
