| 11 Feb 2022 |
 Victor | Hi 👋
Is there someone who have sometime Matrix on Nixos that take 100% of one CPU and a lot of RAM during 1 day for any reasons ? | 20:04:06 |
 Ralith | if you're asking about synapse, that's just how it is | 20:11:40 |
| Ralith | make sure you're using postgresql | 20:11:48 |
| Victor | i'm using postgresql, and I never had this behavior. I'm not in large room ... so I'm surprise | 20:18:44 |
| 12 Feb 2022 |
|  Janne Heß left the room. | 00:14:54 |
 fadenb | Victor: are you seeing more than usual requests? From time to time my CPU utilization goes up if some server starts requesting large chunks of history for a room | 14:11:11 |
| Victor | In reply to @fadenb:utzutzutz.net
Victor: are you seeing more than usual requests? From time to time my CPU utilization goes up if some server starts requesting large chunks of history for a room since yesterday morning, I've more requests indeed. | 15:14:56 |
| 13 Feb 2022 |
 @fantasycookie17:artemislena.eu | 
Download bd8a5006-3cc9-45c1-b204-6f3eb331861a3099948624274100088_thumbnail_1200.jpg | 16:19:05 |
| @fantasycookie17:artemislena.eu | Uhm… how do I fix this? This doesn't really look like a version conflict to me in the first place… also note I don't need the E2E version of nio… but don't know how to ask NixOS for the non-E2E version… | 16:20:07 |
 hexa | cachetools in nixos master is at 5.0.0 | 16:25:30 |
| hexa | so matrix-nio needs to have its dependency relaxed, if at all possible | 16:25:46 |
| @fantasycookie17:artemislena.eu | Does the non-E2E version also need cachetools<5.0.0? If not, how can I explicitly install the non-E2E version? | 16:33:12 |
| hexa | We don't handle those extra markers | 16:43:04 |
| hexa | Maybe the package offers overrides | 16:43:20 |
| hexa | I'll look into the conflict in a bit | 16:43:51 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/159867 | 17:20:12 |
| hexa | So, anybody up for further reviews of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/158605 or can I consider it good to merge? 😛 | 23:13:03 |
| 14 Feb 2022 |
 Dandellion | I was hoping to take a look at it tomorrow, quick overview looked pretty good though, so if you're comfortable feel free | 00:08:25 |
| hexa | I'm obviously poking the dragon 😛 | 00:24:31 |
| hexa | can't have this go stale | 00:24:45 |
| Dandellion | reviewd' | 19:04:22 |
| Dandellion | I still think we should have a services.matrix thing that could be more opinionated around using nginx and getting a setup that should "just work" with minimal configuration | 19:05:51 |
| hexa | thank you! | 19:05:51 |
| hexa | I agree, but this PR is not that step, it is a precursor to get further changes in. | 19:06:41 |
| Dandellion | yep | 19:06:48 |
| hexa | I responded to everything I believe. | 19:41:49 |
| hexa | Specifically secret handling can be built on top of this and I wouldn't add it to the scope of this PR. It is big enough as it is. | 19:42:18 |
| hexa | Sure, at the same time we're asking people to move their secrets from toplevel into settings, this is part of the bulk change nature of this PR | 19:42:54 |
| hexa | * Sure, at the same time we're asking people to move their secrets from toplevel into settings, this is part of the bulk change nature of this PR. | 19:42:55 |
| hexa | If something isn't a regression I'm hesitant to make behavioral changes, like adding further arbitrary trust anchors. | 19:44:43 |
