| 7 Oct 2022 |
 problems | has anyone tried packaging the sliding sync proxy yet? (https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync) | 21:06:23 |
| problems | seems like they're aiming to deploy that for matrix.org instead of implementing it in synapse, at least at first | 21:08:46 |
| 13 Oct 2022 |
 philipp | https://www.process-one.net/blog/matrix-protocol-added-to-ejabberd/ | 12:53:31 |
| 14 Oct 2022 |
 Zhaofeng Li | In reply to @philipp:xndr.de
https://www.process-one.net/blog/matrix-protocol-added-to-ejabberd/ Looks interesting, but the positioning of Matrix as for "small corporate servers" is kind of odd | 01:55:21 |
 Ralith | that is super weird | 04:47:15 |
| Ralith | trying to downplay it to protect their relevance? | 04:47:28 |
| problems | it's super weird for someone to "just" add matrix server capabilities to a software | 12:54:55 |
| problems | or even a team | 12:55:30 |
| problems | i've watched progress on dendrite and conduit and it's not that easy | 12:55:48 |
| problems | and for them to claim it's gonna be more scalable than existing matrix servers right off the bat, that's pretty bold | 12:56:46 |
| problems | conduit has the boon of ruma already existing and it's still nowhere near ready for production | 12:57:36 |
| philipp | Yeah, those are a couple of very bold claims. | 13:04:50 |
| philipp | And when I remember how ejabberd actually was to run back when I did it, those claims seem to be even bolder. | 13:05:49 |
| problems | since it doesn't say anything about supporting matrix clients i wonder if it just doesn't support e2ee or anything, and only does the bare minimum to bridge xmpp | 14:10:29 |
| problems | that might be more reasonable | 14:10:40 |
| 15 Oct 2022 |
|  underpantsgnome changed their display name from underpantsgnome to underpantsgnome!. | 00:35:40 |
| 17 Oct 2022 |
 f0x | does anyone have a Synapse 1.69.0 build yet? | 19:00:59 |
 Sandro 🐧 | at least not public on github | 20:43:03 |
| f0x | https://git.pixie.town/f0x/nixos/src/branch/main/common/services/synapse/package.nix I got my own to work | 20:49:25 |
| f0x | but had to use fetchurl myself because fetchPypi didn't work? | 20:49:53 |
| Sandro 🐧 | they changed something in the download URL I read over in the other channel | 20:55:31 |
| Sandro 🐧 | BTW is your theme broken? The latest commit for the current file is missing. | 20:56:14 |
| f0x | In reply to @sandro:supersandro.de
BTW is your theme broken? The latest commit for the current file is missing. I don't see that on other gitea instances either? | 21:01:19 |
| f0x | nor with the default theme | 21:01:25 |
| Sandro 🐧 | oh, right. Confused it with github somehow. | 21:01:58 |
| f0x | heh | 21:02:13 |
| Sandro 🐧 | 
Download image.png | 21:03:14 |
| 18 Oct 2022 |
 @pacien:pacien.net | hi Sandro 🐧, could you take a look at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/186316?
I think I resolved all the issues you raised | 10:02:46 |
 Winter (she/her) | Notkea: Do build artifacts contain references to the Node source paths? (re: https://github.com/pacien/nixpkgs/blob/843f74f0b1a34feb4d2516940e6b5f0109bf287a/pkgs/servers/matrix-appservice-discord/default.nix#L52) | 13:06:10 |
| @pacien:pacien.net | according to https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/192266,
it seems so as it reduces the closure size a lot | 13:07:27 |
