| 21 Dec 2024 |
|  stablejoy left the room. | 05:08:18 |
|  sleepymonad joined the room. | 21:16:14 |
|  ·☽•Nameless☆•777 · ± changed their profile picture. | 21:37:38 |
| sleepymonad set a profile picture. | 21:56:33 |
| 22 Dec 2024 |
|  allrealmsoflife joined the room. | 20:27:50 |
| 26 Dec 2024 |
|  Lorenz Leutgeb changed their display name from Lorenz Leutgeb to Lorenz Leutgeb (📞6343). | 19:33:43 |
| Lorenz Leutgeb changed their display name from Lorenz Leutgeb (📞6343) to Lorenz Leutgeb 📞6343. | 19:36:58 |
| 27 Dec 2024 |
|  kdn changed their display name from nazarewk to kdn. | 12:38:41 |
| 31 Dec 2024 |
|  getchoo changed their profile picture. | 12:38:57 |
| 1 Jan 2025 |
|  NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 14:26:09 |
|  jopejoe1 changed their display name from jopejoe1 [4094] to jopejoe1. | 23:30:10 |
| 3 Jan 2025 |
 ibizaman | Following up on my message about contracts from a while ago, I finally had the motivation and time to create a pre-RFC about it :) https://discourse.nixos.org/t/pre-rfc-decouple-services-using-structured-typing/58257 | 23:19:16 |
| ibizaman | * Following up on my message about contracts from a little while ago, I finally had the motivation and time to create a pre-RFC about it :) https://discourse.nixos.org/t/pre-rfc-decouple-services-using-structured-typing/58257 | 23:19:47 |
| 6 Jan 2025 |
 nbp | Thank you, while I have some objections about some of the details, I do appreciate a lot the effort in making this possible. I tried to provide a short explanations of my concerns on discord. | 11:58:49 |
| nbp | * Thank you, while I have some objections about some of the details, I do appreciate a lot the effort in making this possible. I tried to provide a short explanations of my concerns on discourse. | 11:59:20 |
| 11 Jan 2025 |
|  Orzklv left the room. | 04:07:52 |
| ·☽•Nameless☆•777 · ± changed their profile picture. | 04:42:56 |
|  pandapip1 joined the room. | 21:20:48 |
| 15 Jan 2025 |
|  SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (utc+3) to SomeoneSerge. | 19:01:46 |
 Matt Sturgeon | I was just writing some assertions, and wanted to show the option defs for an attr-of an option, isolated using lib.modules.mergeAttrDefinitionsWithPrio.
However, mergeAttrDefinitionsWithPrio only includes the value and highestPrio, with no access to files, definitions, definitionsWithLocations, etc.
I came up with a proof of concept that seems to mostly work, however it's failing nix-build lib/tests/release.nix so is probably not lazy enough?
My question: is there an intended way to print definitions/locations for an attr-of-an-option and, if not, how could I improve my patch to make it PR-ready? Or is there an alternative approach I could take?
In this specific scenario, I'm wanting to showDefs a _module.args.* attr, but the concept could apply to any attrsOf or lazyAttrsOf option.
| 21:37:21 |
| 17 Jan 2025 |
|  chintuchamar joined the room. | 04:39:17 |
| 27 Jan 2025 |
|  Brisingr05 joined the room. | 02:49:44 |
| 30 Jan 2025 |
|  sarcasticadmin changed their display name from sarcasticadmin to Rob - KM6LBU. | 03:01:40 |
| sarcasticadmin changed their display name from Rob - KM6LBU to sarcasticadmin. | 03:02:55 |
|  laurynasp joined the room. | 08:55:51 |
| 31 Jan 2025 |
|  cafkafk 🏳️⚧️ changed their profile picture. | 05:06:12 |
| SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge to SomeoneSerge (Bruxelles). | 19:35:24 |
| ibizaman | Just stumbled into this today:
The option `nodes.server.nixpkgs.overlays' is defined multiple times while it's expected to be unique.
nixpkgs.overlays is set to read-only
Is there any reason for this? Why isn't the option just being merged?
| 20:12:35 |
| ibizaman | * Just stumbled into this today:
The option `nodes.server.nixpkgs.overlays' is defined multiple times while it's expected to be unique.
nixpkgs.overlays is set to read-only
Is there any reason for this?
| 20:15:05 |
| ibizaman | * Just stumbled into this today:
The option `nodes.server.nixpkgs.overlays' is defined multiple times while it's expected to be unique.
nixpkgs.overlays is set to read-only
Is there any reason for this? Why must it be read-only?
| 20:17:18 |
