| 2 Mar 2025 |
 loudgolem | incase someone wants to answer, https://discourse.nixos.org/t/adding-custom-options-to-nixpkgs-modules-with-arbitrary-attrsets/61039 | 04:12:24 |
 infinisil | loudgolem: Done ) | 04:27:12 |
| infinisil | * loudgolem: Done :) | 04:27:13 |
| 6 Mar 2025 |
 mr-qubo | Is there a mkAfter but for strings? I want to append flags to nixos option programs.captive-browser.browser, and I have no idea how. | 14:40:14 |
 nbp | mkAfter is for any option, so yes, unless you are using dependent strings which are ordered based on dependencies. | 14:42:52 |
 Matt Sturgeon | mkOrder (+ mkBefore & mkAfter) affects the order definitions get merged in, so it is applicable to any mergable type. | 14:42:57 |
| nbp | * mkAfter is for any option, so yes, unless you are using dependent strings which are merged based on dependencies. | 14:43:28 |
| mr-qubo | I've tried using mkAfter and it just replaced the strings enitrely. | 14:43:55 |
| mr-qubo | * I've tried using mkAfter and it just replaced the strings entirely. | 14:44:00 |
| mr-qubo | * I've tried using mkAfter and it just replaced the string entirely. | 14:44:04 |
| nbp | That's because you do not have the same priority level. | 14:44:19 |
| nbp | Or there is a problem with the merge function of the option. | 14:45:37 |
