| 23 Jul 2026 |
 autra | actually yes, I don't make differences between packages I maintain directly, or those through the geospatial team. You can filter by nixpkgs release. My personal link for 26.05 is : https://repology.org/projects/?maintainer=augustin.trancart%40gmail.com&inrepo=nix_stable_26_05&outdated=1 | 09:20:26 |
 Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Something like this: https://repology.org/projects/?maintainer=ivan.mincik%40gmail.com&inrepo=nix_unstable&outdated=1 ?
| 09:20:26 |
| autra | exactly ;-) | 09:20:32 |
| autra | for instance pythonPackages.gdal could be backported | 09:21:00 |
| autra | the only trouble is that repology lags a bit | 09:21:11 |
| autra | so I need an extra search for existing PR before submitting | 09:21:25 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Packages failing to build on Linux: https://github.com/imincik/nix-utils/actions/runs/29994677911 (this job now reports only failing packages) | 09:27:41 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | autra: packages versions + backport | 11:08:04 |
| autra | nice ! How does the backport boolean logic work? | 11:09:54 |
| autra | do you compare with master only, or with all the versions existing of a given software? | 11:10:08 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Based on this we can consider backporting
- mapserver
- postgis
- protozero
- async-tiff
- cartopy
- geopandas
- osmnx
- qgis-ltr
- saga
| 11:11:19 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | This is script producing this output https://github.com/imincik/nix-utils/blob/master/package-versions.py | 11:11:48 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | I addition to BACKPORT column, we can check also NIXPKGS/RELEASE-26.05 column. If you see [-] after version value, it means that version is lower than one in master. | 11:15:32 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | I just merged backport of qgis-ltr which was fogotten. | 11:18:09 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/544871 | 14:14:13 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/544955 is needed to unbreak QGIS . | 18:31:29 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/544955 is needed to unbreak QGIS . Please review. | 18:31:34 |
| 25 Jul 2026 |
 sikmir | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/545662 | 16:17:21 |
| 27 Jul 2026 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/544955 | 11:18:07 |
| 30 Jul 2026 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | autra: do you know what's the best option to unbreak https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/python314Packages.pysfcgal.x86_64-linux/all ? | 07:57:26 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | I need final approval for https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/544955 to unbreak qgis. | 07:58:31 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | * autra: do you know what's the best option to unbreak https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/python314Packages.pysfcgal.x86_64-linux/all https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/sfcgal.x86_64-linux/all ? | 08:20:02 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | * autra: do you know what's the best option to unbreak https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/sfcgal.x86_64-linux/all ? | 08:20:29 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/547349 | 08:20:44 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | List of broken packages on Linux - https://github.com/imincik/nix-utils/actions/runs/30521106065 | 08:21:16 |
| 3 Aug 2026 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Latest QGIS - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/548812 | 13:04:22 |
 Tim Sutton | Thanks for fixing QGIS @iv | 13:07:42 |
| Tim Sutton | * Thanks for fixing QGIS @[Ivan Mincik (imincik)] | 13:07:57 |
| 4 Aug 2026 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/548057 | 08:24:25 |
| 6 Aug 2026 |
|  phanirithvij/loudgolem changed their display name from phanirithvij to phanirithvij/loudgolem. | 07:30:13 |
