!yNLbWuxtZEZoUZYwKG:nixos.org

Nix Geospatial Team

47 Members
Nix Geospatial packages maintenance. Team board - https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/47/views/113 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
25 Oct 2026
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)Thank you very much.17:16:01
27 Oct 2026
@autra:trancart.euautraBreaking changes are now restricted in nixpkgs, but I'd really like to include geos update... :-/19:19:26
@autra:trancart.euautra(still building on my side)19:19:31
29 Oct 2026
@sikmir:matrix.orgsikmirhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/58065519:53:54
30 Oct 2026
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)Thank you Nikolay. Merging now.08:09:24
@autra:trancart.euautraI had a look at cloudcompare and e57inspector: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/580946 I've opened an issue for postgresqlPackages.pointcloud14:56:59
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)e57inspector PR is merging now.15:56:26
@autra:trancart.euautrafor pgpointcloud (waiting for nixpkgs-review) https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/58104816:43:49
@autra:trancart.euautrafor py3dtiles, it looks like a hydra hiccup...16:45:38
@autra:trancart.euautra cloudcompare seems to build ok and be in the cache, so false positive from nix-utils Ivan Mincik (imincik) maybe? 16:48:24
@autra:trancart.euautrasame for graphopper, seems to be in the caceh.16:49:17
@autra:trancart.euautraah no, for graphopper I fixed it locally and forgot :laughing:16:50:39
31 Oct 2026
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)Nice work, thank you. We are getting close to zero failures for geospatial on Linux - https://github.com/imincik/nix-utils/actions/runs/4105100290008:56:59
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)* Nice work, thank you. We are getting close to zero failures for geospatial on x86-64 Linux - https://github.com/imincik/nix-utils/actions/runs/4105100290008:57:30
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)Not bad on Darwin as well - https://github.com/imincik/nix-utils/actions/runs/4105043914608:59:28
1 Nov 2026
@jassu:kapsi.fiJassu joined the room.14:18:26
3 Nov 2026
@autra:trancart.euautraYes, I'm currently dealing with martin, but some tests failures are just odd. I'm tempting to just exclude them :-)09:38:28
4 Nov 2026
@phanirithvij:matrix.orgphanirithvij (loudgolem) changed their display name from phanirithvij/loudgolem to phanirithvij (loudgolem).07:18:44
5 Nov 2026
@r-burns:matrix.orgr-burnsQuick heads up, not sure if you guys are typically involved in staging stabilization, but it looks like the current staging-next iteration has some test failures in geopandas that will be a blocker for some geospatial packages. Might be a good idea to take a look before the staging-next merge. Example: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/352035116/step/1/log00:46:30
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)

Looks like geopandas tests can't find shapely

try:
            import shapely
    
            if Version(shapely.__version__) < Version("2.0.0"):
                shapely = None
        except ImportError:
            shapely = None
    
        if not shapely:
>           raise ValueError("'mask' parameter requires Shapely >= 2.0")
E           ValueError: 'mask' parameter requires Shapely >= 2.0
10:14:15
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)I can't git pull nixpkgs from Github now.10:15:27
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)It is hanging forever10:15:39
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)Shapely is reporting wrong version. I am testing the fix now.11:03:56
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik) * r-burns: Shapely is reporting wrong version. I am testing the fix now. 11:04:11
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)
ix-shell -I nixpkgs=. -p 'python3.withPackages (p: [p.shapely])' --run 'python -c "import shapely; print(shapely.__version__)"'
11:10:24
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik) *
nix-shell -I nixpkgs=. -p 'python3.withPackages (p: [p.shapely])' --run 'python -c "import shapely; print(shapely.__version__)"'
11:10:28
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik) r-burns: which branch I should target with my PR ? 11:21:09
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik) * r-burns: which branch I should target with my PR - staging ? 11:21:30
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/58358311:35:21
6 Nov 2026
@r-burns:matrix.orgr-burnsI think you should target staging-next since it's a fixup for the current staging-next cycle. Looks good, I'll repost it for the staging folks02:16:29

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10