| 24 Sep 2025 |
 Ivan Mincik (imincik) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445492 needs rebase now. Sorry. | 07:07:53 |
 autra | Are gdal, proj, geos considered as blockers for 25.11? | 08:53:16 |
| autra | (I tend to think that it is not, but...) | 08:53:47 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | No, they shouldn't be now. | 10:21:19 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | My new project: https://github.com/imincik/flake-forge | 12:58:10 |
| 25 Sep 2025 |
| autra | should I target staging for geos? | 06:44:27 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Apparently something new started to depend on geos and we are now over 500 rebuilds and need to target staging. I would be very interested what it is and avoid that. | 06:52:28 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | What I do as a workaround is running nixpkgs-review against nixos-unstable to avoid too many builds. | 06:54:29 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445492 now . | 06:56:07 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | autra: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445278 looks good now. Can we merge ? | 11:17:23 |
| autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): the nixpkgs-review run predates the rebase on master, but I think yes. | 11:47:23 |
| autra | I don't expect the results to significantly change | 11:47:42 |
| autra | actually, this one might be a blocker : https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/409210 | 11:57:56 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Why this is a blocker for proj upgrade ? | 12:00:47 |
| autra | No I meant for 25.11 | 12:01:03 |
| autra | although I'm pretty sure this bug is already there in 25.05 so... | 12:01:15 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Ah, ok. It would be great to finally fix it. | 12:01:33 |
| autra | I'll try to update postgis first, and see if we get lucky ;-) | 12:02:33 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445278 now . | 12:03:14 |
| 26 Sep 2025 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | PDAL update for review : https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/436159 | 06:16:08 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | autra: great thanks for GEOS update PR. Do you know what is causing so many packages to fail ? | 06:21:13 |
| autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): I'm investigating, but so far it looks like a break that landed on staging, unrelated to any geospatial packages. it seems to have been fixed in the meantime, and I'm currently executing nixpkgs-review again | 06:44:05 |
| autra | on the machine I'm using, it takes ~24h | 06:44:16 |
| autra | right now it is building the entire world (clang right now) | 07:04:22 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Thanks for doing that. Did you try to build against unstable branch ? Staging is not cached while unstable is. | 07:07:55 |
| autra | well ok, clang doesn't build on staging 😆 | 07:20:40 |
| autra | I'll try that | 07:20:44 |
 sikmir | Maybe interesting https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/413335 | 08:01:28 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Thanks | 10:54:55 |
| 28 Sep 2025 |
| autra | I'm getting an interesting problems with python-mapnik: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/446919#issuecomment-3343966940 | 17:44:44 |
