| 8 Sep 2025 |
|  inayet set a profile picture. | 02:16:05 |
| 9 Sep 2025 |
 Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Trivial to review - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/437112 . Thanks. | 06:49:03 |
| 10 Sep 2025 |
|  SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (@nixcon & back on matrix) to SomeoneSerge (back on matrix). | 00:35:24 |
| 14 Sep 2025 |
|  Emma [it/its] joined the room. | 08:39:44 |
| 22 Sep 2025 |
 autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): I'm currently having a look at the geos update PR, ok for you? | 09:57:56 |
| autra | I'll try to update geos, gdal and proj asap, so that we can fix stuff early enough before 25.11 | 17:00:17 |
| autra | (other impactful package is tiff, but we only have a patch release there) | 17:00:48 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | THis would be great. There are some PRs open
| 17:00:51 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | But I was struggling to run nixpkgs-review for them | 17:01:03 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Let me know if you need me. | 17:01:22 |
| autra | yeah, unfortunately, I cannot push to PR opened by ryantm. Maybe I should ask for this commit bit at last 😅 | 17:01:25 |
| autra | I have the ressources to run nixpkgs-review, I'm doing it on geos right now. | 17:02:07 |
| 23 Sep 2025 |
| autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): so it seems that the gdal upgrade is a prerequisite to both geos and proj update. | 08:27:58 |
| autra | for geos, we need this as well: https://github.com/autra/nixpkgs/commit/366f40cd7ff173b1a99273736a99c209ec09a2df | 08:34:53 |
| autra | and I have good hopes it'll work ok | 08:35:01 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Thanks. I am happy to quickly review your PR . | 09:08:36 |
|  kenji changed their display name from a-kenji to kenji. | 10:43:02 |
| 24 Sep 2025 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | autra: I am reviewing and merging our PRs now. Ping me if you need something. | 06:57:04 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445492 needs rebase now. Sorry. | 07:07:53 |
| autra | Are gdal, proj, geos considered as blockers for 25.11? | 08:53:16 |
| autra | (I tend to think that it is not, but...) | 08:53:47 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | No, they shouldn't be now. | 10:21:19 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | My new project: https://github.com/imincik/flake-forge | 12:58:10 |
| 25 Sep 2025 |
| autra | should I target staging for geos? | 06:44:27 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Apparently something new started to depend on geos and we are now over 500 rebuilds and need to target staging. I would be very interested what it is and avoid that. | 06:52:28 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | What I do as a workaround is running nixpkgs-review against nixos-unstable to avoid too many builds. | 06:54:29 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Merging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445492 now . | 06:56:07 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | autra: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445278 looks good now. Can we merge ? | 11:17:23 |
| autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): the nixpkgs-review run predates the rebase on master, but I think yes. | 11:47:23 |
| autra | I don't expect the results to significantly change | 11:47:42 |
