In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
sikmir: are you able to test the build of owslib on Darwin for this PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314546 ? Thanks

In reply to @sikmir:matrix.org
Build on darwin is ok for me (163 passed, 70 deselected, 9 warnings).

In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
sikmir: are you able to test the build of owslib on Darwin for this PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314546 ? Thanks

In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
nix run nixpkgs#nixpkgs-review -- pr 315042 keeps getting OOM-killed after a while (more often than not taking my whole GNOME session down with it). Is there a way to find out which of the builds takes up so much memory, so that I can tell nixpkgs-review to skip it?

In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
Another ZHF PR, easy to review: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314801

In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
This should probably be backported to 24.05. Shall I add the labels backport release-24.05 and/or backport staging-24.05?

In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916

In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
Backport to staging-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316915
Backport to release-24.05: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/316916

In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
Should be back ported to release-24.05

In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
I've seen it done this way during ZHF for stuff that blocks other builds on both branches. Is it to be handled differently after release? Oder was that the wrong thing to do already during ZHF?

In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
I've seen it done this way during ZHF for stuff that blocks other builds on both branches. Is it to be handled differently after release? Oder was that the wrong thing to do already during ZHF?

In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
master already has the change through https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314801. But as the release branches were cut off before that, they don't have it yet.