Nix Geospatial Team | 34 Members | |
| Nix Geospatial packages maintenance. Team board - https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/47/views/1 | 9 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Feb 2024 | ||
| What about opening issue in GDAL ? | 19:26:23 | |
| So many issues in those few instructions in elevation README :) | 19:31:00 | |
| Good reminder why I use Nix | 19:34:49 | |
| Please review this trivial patch version update - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/286713 . Thanks. | 21:04:05 | |
In reply to @imincik:matrix.orgThe first thing someone is going to ask is how to reproduce, and I think I'll need some help with that. There are a bajillion options, and I'm not very familiar with cmake, and even less familiar with GDAL. | 23:46:11 | |
In reply to @imincik:matrix.org* The first thing someone is going to ask is how to reproduce, and I think I'll need some help with that. There are a bajillion options, and I'm not very familiar with cmake, and even less familiar with GDAL. I'd be surprised if they'd be OK with running nix-build to test it, but I could start with that. | 23:46:58 | |
| Looks like there's already a relevant issue. | 23:48:01 | |
* Looks like there's already a relevant issue. I'll try building libtiff with lerc to see if that fixes it… | 23:50:47 | |
| 22 Feb 2024 | ||
| Is anyone familiar enough with libtiff to create some tests? I feel like if LERC support should be added to libtiff then it should be tested in the libtiff package, not in GDAL. | 00:05:25 | |
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.orgIs it working with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/290556 | 09:17:53 | |
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.org* Is it working with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/290556 ? | 09:17:57 | |
| Yep, that's how I verified the libtiff change. There's no libtiff test to verify that LERC support has been enabled yet. | 09:18:44 | |
| You should be able to verify with
| 09:24:05 | |
| * You should be able to verify with
| 09:24:45 | |
| * You should be able to verify with
(It takes forever to build, though.) | 09:25:13 | |
| What about trying
| 09:25:42 | |
tiffinfo contains Compression Scheme: None field | 09:26:26 | |
| I did verify using that, but I don't know of any good TIFFs I could use for the test. Ideally I'd use libtiff to create a 1x1 LERC TIFF and then read its info, but libtiff doesn't seem to come with CLI tools to create TIFFs. | 09:26:50 | |
| * I did verify using that (or one of the other executables included in libtiff; I don't remember), but I don't know of any good TIFFs I could use for the test. Ideally I'd use libtiff to create a 1x1 LERC TIFF and then read its info, but libtiff doesn't seem to come with CLI tools to create TIFFs. | 09:27:51 | |
| Thank you for the help, by the way! | 09:28:30 | |
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.orgThen use gdal to create the tiff file. | 09:30:20 | |
| I was going to say that would take 100x the build time, but of course the libtiff tests already include the GDAL test suite. 🤔 OK, I'll give it a shot. | 09:31:09 | |
| * I was going to say that would take 100x the build time, but of course the libtiff tests already include the GDAL test suite. 🤔 OK, I'll give it a shot. Tomorrow. 💤 | 09:31:49 | |
In reply to @imincik:matrix.org Something like
| 09:34:44 | |
|
with
| 09:52:58 | |
| I've submitted a Nix talk for FOSS4G Europe conference. Please vote for the talk if you want to help me to be accepted - https://talks.osgeo.org/foss4g-europe-2024/p/voting/signup . Talk title is "Can we use Nix as a default way of distributing geospatial software ?" (second page of the list). Thanks ! | 12:34:36 | |
New approach of proj-data integration to proj - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/290643 . I am finally happy with that. | 17:29:23 | |
In reply to @imincik:matrix.orgDo you have some specific suggestions? I'd love to improve this process for the team. | 20:30:45 | |
Would it be useful to add enable* ? true parameters for each of the optional dependencies, in case someone wants a minimal libtiff? Or is that too much control? | 20:40:16 | |
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.orgNot for now. Not until somebody needs that. | 20:41:55 | |