| 11 Feb 2024 |
 Ivan Mincik (imincik) | What we currently maintain is the list of most important geo software. | 18:37:35 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) |
I'll probably file another pull request to remove myself from teams.geospatial.
Would you please do this change in separate PR ? Thanks.
| 18:44:57 |
 das-g | Sure. | 18:46:43 |
| das-g | Should I hold off the current one then, until my removal from the team is merged, so that I'm at no point in the history doubly maintainer of the affected packages? | 18:47:31 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
Should I hold off the current one then, until my removal from the team is merged, so that I'm at no point in the history doubly maintainer of the affected packages? Yes, we should merge your removal from the team . If you are really sure... | 18:48:25 |
| das-g | Or I could change the current one to add the team and remove myself from the individual packages, and than re-add myself when I remove myself from the team. (Though that seems like unnecessary noise in the packages' histories.) | 18:48:53 |
| das-g | Alright, here's my self-removal from the team: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/288118 | 18:57:23 |
| das-g | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
I am sorry for that. I see you are more after maintenance of OSM software. No worries. I still think the teams are a good idea. It's just that the scope of the geospatial team is too big for me. I'll still stay in this room to keep up-to-date on what's going on in this field. | 19:00:31 |
| das-g | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
I am sorry for that. I see you are more after maintenance of OSM software. About OSM software: Yeah, but mostly because some of it was still missing in NixPkgs when I needed it, so I've packaged it if I was able to do so. I do use other geospatial software (such at QGIS), too. | 19:01:12 |
| das-g | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
What we currently maintain is the list of most important geo software. Is the packages to which I'd like to add the team as a co-maintainer in scope for the geospatial team? I kinda assumed so, but probably not all of them are part of the "most important geo software". | 19:03:45 |
| das-g | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
What we currently maintain is the list of most important geo software. * Is the packages to which I'd like to add the team as a co-maintainer with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/288107 in scope for the geospatial team? I kinda assumed so, but probably not all of them are part of the "most important geo software". | 19:04:15 |
| das-g | * Are the packages to which I'd like to add the team as a co-maintainer with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/288107 in scope for the geospatial team? I kinda assumed so, but probably not all of them are "most important geo software". | 19:12:17 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @das-g:matrix.org
Are the packages to which I'd like to add the team as a co-maintainer with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/288107 in scope for the geospatial team? I kinda assumed so, but probably not all of them are "most important geo software". I would be happy to maintain all geo software, but I am not sure about protozero or ili2c. All OSM tools are OK. | 19:13:29 |
| das-g | protozero is a dependency of osmium and osm2pgsql | 19:14:40 |
