| 20 Sep 2024 |
 Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Also, sometimes it takes very long time until update bot creates PR after new release. | 18:44:37 |
 Tim Sutton | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
No, but I would be interested to investigate this use case once I have some free time. Ah matrix probably treats uploads ephemerally | 19:54:40 |
| 21 Sep 2024 |
 autra | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
I think update script is not mandatory. In many trivial cases update bot can just check latest release and create PR without update script. It might only consider releases, not tags though (I still need to debug a bit to be extra sure of that). And apparently, only github is supported now. | 18:57:32 |
| 22 Sep 2024 |
 sikmir | We have broken cross compilation for libspatialite, librasterlite2, librttopo and grass, any ideas how to fix?
> checking for geos-config... /nix/store/05jx4m5cx65gvg56ycglys0q3i20hvyn-geos-3.12.2/bin/geos-config
> checking for geos_c.h... yes
> checking for library containing GEOSContext_setErrorMessageHandler_r... no
> configure: error: could not find libgeos_c (or obsolete 'libgeos_c' < v.3.5.0 found) - you may need to specify the directory of a geos-config file using --with-geosconfig
| 13:11:43 |
| 25 Sep 2024 |
| autra | @imincik:matrix.org: I've invited you to my fork so that we can collaborate for geos. | 10:28:30 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
@imincik:matrix.org: I've invited you to my fork so that we can collaborate for geos. Thanks | 10:29:42 |
| autra | In reply to @sikmir:matrix.org
We have broken cross compilation for libspatialite, librasterlite2, librttopo and grass, any ideas how to fix?
> checking for geos-config... /nix/store/05jx4m5cx65gvg56ycglys0q3i20hvyn-geos-3.12.2/bin/geos-config
> checking for geos_c.h... yes
> checking for library containing GEOSContext_setErrorMessageHandler_r... no
> configure: error: could not find libgeos_c (or obsolete 'libgeos_c' < v.3.5.0 found) - you may need to specify the directory of a geos-config file using --with-geosconfig
From which arch to which arch? Btw where do you look to get these build status? Is there a way to get notified? | 10:45:22 |
| autra | (no idea right now, sorry ) | 10:45:44 |
| autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): thanks for the nix why-depends command! Now I need to figure out why the heck psycopg depends on geos :-O From the github it seems geos is only referenced when building the doc (which still seems odd to me) | 12:51:07 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
Ivan Mincik (imincik): thanks for the nix why-depends command! Now I need to figure out why the heck psycopg depends on geos :-O From the github it seems geos is only referenced when building the doc (which still seems odd to me) Maybe because it is built with PostGIS support ? | 12:52:08 |
| autra | yeah, apparently. Through shapely | 12:52:34 |
| autra | psycopg supports transforming geometries from postgis directly into shapely instances. Fair enough! | 12:53:27 |
| autra | I'm executing nixpgks-review for geos. From what I can gather, psycopg and gdal are still failing... | 13:08:02 |
| autra | wait no, gdal is still building actually :-) | 13:08:35 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
I'm executing nixpgks-review for geos. From what I can gather, psycopg and gdal are still failing... You can check nixpkgs-review logs in .cache/nixpkgs-review directory
. | 13:10:06 |
| sikmir | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
From which arch to which arch? Btw where do you look to get these build status? Is there a way to get notified? nix build -L .#pkgsCross.armv7l-hf-multiplatform.libspatialite | 22:51:00 |
| 26 Sep 2024 |
| autra | sikmir: have you tried bisecting already? Do we have a known good commit in the past? | 07:55:09 |
| sikmir | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
sikmir: have you tried bisecting already? Do we have a known good commit in the past? I've not investigated yet | 22:35:24 |
| 27 Sep 2024 |
| autra | Wow that being said, bisecting nixpkgs is not always a piece of cake. I naively started "git bisect run nix-build ..." for gmt from somewhere in 2022, and the amount of rebuilds is massive. Next time I'll be a bit more clever :-) | 07:17:40 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
Wow that being said, bisecting nixpkgs is not always a piece of cake. I naively started "git bisect run nix-build ..." for gmt from somewhere in 2022, and the amount of rebuilds is massive. Next time I'll be a bit more clever :-) I did successful bisecting on qgis once. It took long time but i found the issue. | 16:40:40 |
