| 20 Sep 2024 |
 Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
Ivan Mincik (imincik): once there is no dependency to it any more, we'll be able to drop geos 3.9 from nixpkgs right? (only django seems to depend on it right now) Looks like this question is missing some context - what is the package in question ? | 04:37:09 |
 autra | Geos 3.9, (well it's called geos_3_9 actually, as opposed to "geos", which is 3.12.1 currently) | 04:55:11 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
Geos 3.9, (well it's called geos_3_9 actually, as opposed to "geos", which is 3.12.1 currently) Thanks, I agree. We should drop old geos once nothing depends on it. | 06:11:31 |
| autra | Hi everyone! Where can I find the correct doc for ryantm bot that creates update PR? I don't seem to find a piece of doc that explains what I observe in nixpkgs. For instance, this doc and this one seems to imply we need a passthru.updateScript. That is what I see when I execute nix-shell maintainers/scripts/update.nix --argstr maintainer autra for instance. But I've seen some PR for proj opened by this bot, without proj having such a script. What's going on? 😆 | 07:20:18 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
Hi everyone! Where can I find the correct doc for ryantm bot that creates update PR? I don't seem to find a piece of doc that explains what I observe in nixpkgs. For instance, this doc and this one seems to imply we need a passthru.updateScript. That is what I see when I execute nix-shell maintainers/scripts/update.nix --argstr maintainer autra for instance. But I've seen some PR for proj opened by this bot, without proj having such a script. What's going on? 😆 No idea other than https://github.com/nix-community/nixpkgs-update | 11:54:57 |
| autra | Thanks! Ok I need to dig to understand then :-) | 13:08:07 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Let me know if you find something | 13:14:53 |
| autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): at least for python packages, a passthru.updateScript is automatically setup on derivation that don't have it by mkPythonDerivation: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/interpreters/python/mk-python-derivation.nix#L223 | 17:13:53 |
| autra | following stuff: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/interpreters/python/update-python-libraries/default.nix and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/interpreters/python/update-python-libraries/update-python-libraries.py | 17:16:20 |
| autra | which in turn seems to use the fetcher to check if a new version is published :-) | 17:16:41 |
| autra | neat! | 17:16:56 |
| autra | it doesn't explain why this bot didn't update mapclassify for instance, but well... | 17:42:57 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | I think update script is not mandatory. In many trivial cases update bot can just check latest release and create PR without update script. | 18:41:25 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | Also, sometimes it takes very long time until update bot creates PR after new release. | 18:44:37 |
 Tim Sutton | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
No, but I would be interested to investigate this use case once I have some free time. Ah matrix probably treats uploads ephemerally | 19:54:40 |
| 21 Sep 2024 |
| autra | In reply to @imincik:matrix.org
I think update script is not mandatory. In many trivial cases update bot can just check latest release and create PR without update script. It might only consider releases, not tags though (I still need to debug a bit to be extra sure of that). And apparently, only github is supported now. | 18:57:32 |
| 22 Sep 2024 |
 sikmir | We have broken cross compilation for libspatialite, librasterlite2, librttopo and grass, any ideas how to fix?
> checking for geos-config... /nix/store/05jx4m5cx65gvg56ycglys0q3i20hvyn-geos-3.12.2/bin/geos-config
> checking for geos_c.h... yes
> checking for library containing GEOSContext_setErrorMessageHandler_r... no
> configure: error: could not find libgeos_c (or obsolete 'libgeos_c' < v.3.5.0 found) - you may need to specify the directory of a geos-config file using --with-geosconfig
| 13:11:43 |
| 25 Sep 2024 |
| autra | @imincik:matrix.org: I've invited you to my fork so that we can collaborate for geos. | 10:28:30 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
@imincik:matrix.org: I've invited you to my fork so that we can collaborate for geos. Thanks | 10:29:42 |
| autra | In reply to @sikmir:matrix.org
We have broken cross compilation for libspatialite, librasterlite2, librttopo and grass, any ideas how to fix?
> checking for geos-config... /nix/store/05jx4m5cx65gvg56ycglys0q3i20hvyn-geos-3.12.2/bin/geos-config
> checking for geos_c.h... yes
> checking for library containing GEOSContext_setErrorMessageHandler_r... no
> configure: error: could not find libgeos_c (or obsolete 'libgeos_c' < v.3.5.0 found) - you may need to specify the directory of a geos-config file using --with-geosconfig
From which arch to which arch? Btw where do you look to get these build status? Is there a way to get notified? | 10:45:22 |
| autra | (no idea right now, sorry ) | 10:45:44 |
| autra | Ivan Mincik (imincik): thanks for the nix why-depends command! Now I need to figure out why the heck psycopg depends on geos :-O From the github it seems geos is only referenced when building the doc (which still seems odd to me) | 12:51:07 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
Ivan Mincik (imincik): thanks for the nix why-depends command! Now I need to figure out why the heck psycopg depends on geos :-O From the github it seems geos is only referenced when building the doc (which still seems odd to me) Maybe because it is built with PostGIS support ? | 12:52:08 |
| autra | yeah, apparently. Through shapely | 12:52:34 |
| autra | psycopg supports transforming geometries from postgis directly into shapely instances. Fair enough! | 12:53:27 |
| autra | I'm executing nixpgks-review for geos. From what I can gather, psycopg and gdal are still failing... | 13:08:02 |
| autra | wait no, gdal is still building actually :-) | 13:08:35 |
| Ivan Mincik (imincik) | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
I'm executing nixpgks-review for geos. From what I can gather, psycopg and gdal are still failing... You can check nixpkgs-review logs in .cache/nixpkgs-review directory
. | 13:10:06 |
| sikmir | In reply to @autra:trancart.eu
From which arch to which arch? Btw where do you look to get these build status? Is there a way to get notified? nix build -L .#pkgsCross.armv7l-hf-multiplatform.libspatialite | 22:51:00 |
| 26 Sep 2024 |
| autra | sikmir: have you tried bisecting already? Do we have a known good commit in the past? | 07:55:09 |
